I have another question for you Xtians. Please read this verse from the Bible as taken from the NWT:
*** Rbi8 Genesis 14:14 ***
Thus A'bram got to hear that his brother had been taken captive. With that he mustered his trained men, three hundred and eighteen slaves born in his household, and went in pursuit up to Dan.
Nothing untoward in that scripture?WRONG! What about the city of Dan? That city did not even exist in Abrahams time! Read what the INSIGHT book says about it:
*** it-1 573-4 Dan ***
3. A city in the extreme N of Palestine. Prior to its capture by the tribe of Dan, it was called Leshem or Laish by the pagan inhabitants. (Jos 19:47; Jg 18:7, 27) The Danites rebuilt the destroyed city and called it “Dan by the name of their father, Dan.” (Jg 18:28, 29) However, the city is mentioned some four centuries earlier by the name of Dan in the account of Abraham’s pursuit of Chedorlaomer and his allies all the way “up to Dan.” (Ge 14:14) There is nothing to argue against the existence of this name, Dan, as applying to the indicated area in the time of Abraham. The correspondence of this early name to that of the forefather of the tribe of Dan may have been coincidental or even divinely directed.
"Divinely directed"? I can think of a better one than that!
Umm
UO