by sf 11 Replies latest jw friends
"charles t. russell military illuminati" is what yielded this search result (FOR THOSE I KNOW WHO ARE REQUESTING THESE RESULTS):
< http://www.svpvril.com/nwo.html
I guess Kissinger was drunk too when he said what he said. lolololol
Oh, just wanted to throw this one in too:
< http://www.hiscorearcade.com/skullandbones.htm
And I thought we had to worry about Jaracz. bwahhhhhhhh, oh yea, WE DO!
sKally, more to Kome
. http://www.svpvril.com/index.htm#It's%20a
followed the links back to this home page.
Another crackpot, another crackpot theory.
Adding it to the collection...
This wholistic merging of science, music, art and philosophy is based on the idea that everything in the universe vibrates. Therefore the connecting link between all that there is is vibration.
Yeah, sure. Hand me the acid, please....
I'm going to Denmark, and I'll stay away from the stuff these folks are using:))
Yakki Da
Kent
"The only difference between God and Adolf Hitler is that God is more proficient at genocide."
Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
http://watchtower.observer.org
Here is a photo of Kissinger when he found out about the illuminati I do understand his statements. LOL
Yakki Da
Kent
"The only difference between God and Adolf Hitler is that God is more proficient at genocide."
Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
http://watchtower.observer.org
No, skally, I still don't believe in a NewWorldOrder, and neither should you. You were a JW, and you managed to get out. exJWs are usually among the most astute at picking apart specious arguments. You are not. You seem to be gullible, or at the very least, you gravitate toward whatever fits your opinion. That's a shame, for it's what we broke free from when we left the WTS. You are now like You Know, running in circles waiting for this vast conspiracy to break out. You will both be waiting your entire lives.
You, are simply reading Me all wrong. Perhaps You should select another "book" to read.
sKally
You post things on a public board, and the public make comments. If you don't want people posting comments on your "book," why post them here?
And I read you correctly, based on your enthusiasm for such sites, even the ones that have zero credibility. If you use a more discerning eye, it would provide less fuel to those JWs that criticize exJWs for "telling lies." But that's just my opinion, stated on this public board. Overall you do great work. If you would just use more discernment, you would be even more effective.
SF,
Hey despite the sneers of the super intellectual self-appointed 'betters' in this forum I am not put off from confessing an interest in these subjects myself.
I actually choose to believe what I want and read what I want and post what I want.
There's a few similar threads going on at the moment and the same old people are curling their lips as usual.
Keep posting your 'weird' stuff and I'll keep an eye out for it and look without peeing on your bonfire.
Free
Right, call me names to make your point. Good.
Look, skally can read and believe what she wants. All I was saying is that, in my opinion, she hurts the exJW cause when she posts stuff that has been debunked. It makes us look like crackpots.
Believe what you want, post what you want, but allow me the same freedom to comment what I want without you making personal derogatory comments about me for exercising my freedom. All I said about skally is that I feel she could be more discerning, and less gullible, but that she was doing good work overall. For that I get called "super intellectual self-apointed betters", who doesn't want to allow others to believe what they want, who curls his lips "as usual", and "peeing on your bonfire."
Wow! What a stark difference between my words of criticism towards skally and your words towards people such as myself. Maybe I should just accuse you of being a self-appointed better, who chose to pee on my bonfire?
Unbelievable...
Free2Beme,
Thank you. Well done.
Danny
