Do Skeptics Draw Conclusions?

Blueblades

I say, they do.What do you think?
Blueblades
StinkyPantz

Uh.. yeah.
Midget-Sasquatch

Yes. Why wouldn't they?
Are you thinking of skepticism so extreme that a person can't ascertain anything? That'd be useless.
Elsewhere

Sometimes I will try to sketch them... but I've never been very good at drawing.
Carmel

I'm skeptical of it! Therefore I doubt it!
caveman
Incense_and_Peppermints

yes... even though they're supposed to be skeptical of everything...
Blueblades

When a Skeptic draws a conclusion, He / She is no longer a Skeptic on that issue that made them skeptic in the first place, right. So, one could be a skeptic for some time, then after much pondering, can come to a conclusion on something and yet still remain skeptical on something else, right.
Blueblades
gumby

Blueblades......a skeptic is someone who doubts generally accepted ideas. For instance ....a person can believe they have good reason to doubt the validity of the bible. THis person may have firm convictions that it's a manmade book. This person is a bible skeptic, although this person has drawn his own conclusions about the bible. So yes, a person can be a skeptic and still hold their own beliefs.
Gumby
logansrun

Truly scientifically minded people only draw tentative conclusions.
B.
czarofmischief

Truly scientifically minded people only draw tentative conclusions.

So evolution is just a hypothesis then?
CZAR