I've been accused of manufacturing these tales, ever since I first sent Randy Watters the articles he used at Free Minds. In fact, all I have ever done is scribe the anecdotes that others shared with me after I told MY true stories.
Mention 'wooden spoons' in any crowd of ex-JWs anywhere, online or realtime, and the memories come flooding forth. This happens everywhere JWs exist. JWs routinely whack infants who babble and coo, they start early and the violence escalates until the child is too scared to wiggle or giggle or whisper during meetings.
BTW for the one who wondered if things have changed in 20 years, the quotes from that JW parenting board were made in 1999. Is that recent enough to show they still do this?
I don't think, (striving for fairness here) that Brooklyn actually meant for folks to use rubber hose, belt buckles, hairbrushes, or to bang heads together or to leave welts and bruises... but insisting that corporal punishment is good and necessary leads almost inevitably to abuse. For spanking to be effective, it must be done seldom, entirely without anger, and used only as a deterrent for the most serious dangerous behaviors. I don't see that among JWs. I see a lot of social intimidation to keep kids quiet and submissive at any cost, and no consideration of the childrens' needs.
Using physical punishment unfortunately almost always leads to abusive behavior. Especially in a hierarchical situation like JW congregations where the pecking order is so rigid...kids, at the very downstream point in that hippo hierarchy, get to eat all the residual anger and frustration and guilt and shame that the higher-ups excrete after their meals of WT spiritual food. They get punished for not living up to unrealistic expectations. They get punished, all too often, because some adult gets a rush of power from intimidating and manhandling a little person. And abusers among JWs get positive feedback for doing so! As long as the kid doesn't die, beating is aok among JWs, and they won't listen to reason because the Bible, and Brooklyn, both say it's a good thing.
I'm trying to figure a way to use this material without getting so irate and ill that my prejudice ruins the effect of the article. So far I am entirely unable to muster any moderate tone in talking about this issue.
Side note: I recently had a gritty conversation with my middle son, who admitted to a lot of anger that his little brother has never been beaten or forced into submission. He honestly thought I should treat the little one the same way I treated him! He sees my change in attitude as proof somehow that I love the little guy better. I've had to do even more painful examination of big parts of our life in order to set him straight, and to quit feeling guilt over things I can't change. My point is, that fugging hierarchical submission bugbear is STILL mucking with our family dynamic after more than ten years out of the cult! Imagine what is does to people who don't know where to start in changing that hierarchical dynamic!
It's a hot-button issue for many, and hopefully exposure of the abuse will lead to positive change. Someone once opined to me that at least in USA government won't intervene out of fear of violating religious rights. In that case it's even more crucial for us to publicize these heinous acts done in God's name.