I'm sorry, Blabbermouth, but the position of annoying delusional guy with a 'savior complex' has already been taken by someone else.
Jean
by blabbermouth 20 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
I'm sorry, Blabbermouth, but the position of annoying delusional guy with a 'savior complex' has already been taken by someone else.
Jean
Wasn't king james a homosexual? Not that there is anything wrong w that. But why is a bible put together by a homosexual the only one that works?
S
Gawd, you guys make me laugh.
Seriously though...
Welcome Kayla, and thank you for your concern.
Perhaps you can help me, for i have a problem. I am certain that if I had the power I would wipe away all suffering anonymously; without any psychological need to be accepted, honored or worshipped by anyone for it. I'm certainly not special in this and feel that most loving and compassionate folks, like yourself, would do the same, secretly just because it feels good to do unto others as we would like. So, please tell me how am I to honestly and sincerely worship and admire a Jesus, or God, that shows less love and needs more ego gratification than most of the fine folks who are reading this? How can I with any degree of inner integrity, worship as The Most High, that, which is obviously lower?
Perhaps though, this isn't about God at all, but rather about limited ideas which some tribal men call "God"; and which we unquestionably accept -- no matter what version of their book we read.
j
You mean........you MEAN........the only way to the Father... ISN'T through his earthly organization?
Well I'll be durned!
Annie
edited to add------you'll notice NO vulgarity was used. Does Blabbermouth approve of this post?
It doesn't appear to be an airtight case, but still quite strong. Here are some character references from james' contemporaries:
?Meanwhile, he enjoyed his court, and Carr. His new favorite was perfect for him in every way-including a capacity for bisexuality. James liked men who liked women; he was not jealous of their heterosexual affairs. On the contrary, he enjoyed hearing details; they seemed to help convince him of women?s inferiority.? Otto Scott: James I: The Fool as King
Francis Osborne:
??the love the King showed was as amorously conveyed as if he had mistaken their sex and thought them ladies, which I have seen Somerset and [Villiers] labour to resemble, in the effeminateness of their dressings, though in whoreson lookes and wanton gestures, they exceeded any part of womankind my conversation did every cope withal. Nor was his love, or what else posterity will please to call it...carried on with discretion sufficient to cover a lesse scandalous behavior; for the kings kissing them after so lascivious a mode in public, and upon the theatre, as it were, of the world, prompted many to imagine some things in the tying-house [bedroom] that exceeded my expressions??
Both quotes found in Robert Ashton: James I by his Contemporaries, p 114
?Throughout his life, however, James exhibited little interest in the opposite sex. It seems that he never had a mistress [virtually unknown among English kings] and was interested in women only as wives and mothers of his male friends.? Encyclopedia Britannica.
One Scotsman wrote: ?James had all woman?s vanity?James, however, seemed to them a pedantic Scot with the mentality of a French harlot. No wonder it was whispered that King Elizabeth had been succeeded by Queen James.? By Scotsman Gedees MacGregor: A Literary History of the Bible p.72
And more recently national faggot magazine Advocate has listed King James as one of their 67 renowned and famous homosexuals and bisexuals. The Book of Lists, Vol 1, by Irving Wallace.
Go easy on my freat ancestor "James" Satanus. Jamie... ( my family called him Jamie ), liked watchin gladiators. I like watchin um and I ain't gay.
James Thomas.....I was actually on the same page as you for the very first time in that last post of yours!!!!!!!
Gumby
"through me" - the way I have lived
I am the Way
well hello to you and welcome
Nothing like laying your cards on the table!!! having a blabbermouth may well get you in trouble on here, but it may also prove interesting.
Some of us do still believe what you preach........some of it anyway. yes i agree the way to Jehova is through Jesus and he alone is the way back to a relationship with god. i do not believe however, the teachings on hell as held by the church. i will never believe the teaching of everlasting torment. and if the bible is right and if the bible means hell as being a place of everlasting torment, then i would denounce anything to do with God. No how, no way, not ever, for any person, however bad bad bad, do they deserve everlasting torment. that is not justice.....it is sick.
bi for now
holly
Oh blabbermouth!
You're so funny! LMAO!
Welcome to the forum and I hope you keep entertaining us!
Oh, dear blabbermouth,
It is so encouraging to find someone who has come to this board with a firm purpose in mind.
I do admit that I am non-christian, and, at times, I can be vulgar, but, I would not call myself a vulgar non-christain. That would be just unfair.
I tried the down on my knees business but by the time I found a comfortable position all I could think was "Why in the christ am I down here if I'm not scrubbing the floor?"
And, to return the kind thought - May god richly bless you rSoul
cheeses. who never can recall of what he needs to be repentant.