think there is abit of paranoia and deliberately looking for faults going on here...there is no ambiguity in the statements....an inactive person is NOT the same as a d/a person...and an inactive person has always been someone who is not active in the ministry even though they may be attending all the meetings and doing nothing else wrong......so no ..no-one is going to be considered organizationally as being d/a because they dont go to meetings or engage in fs...these ones should still be getting regular help from loving concerned sheperds..lol...what is of interest is whether they address the issue of who gets disfellowshipped...the book says UNREPENTANT wrongdoers but pretty much all the d/fs i have heard of recently inc my own have been of GENUINELY SORRY wrongdoers who were just not believed by an incompetent untrained unqualified unaccountable j/c hellbent (tijkmo) on executing punishment...
Of note too is the comment that someone may become inactive due to PERSECUTION...which is understandable if you are locked in solitary confinement but ought never to be the result of treatment by other members of the true religion noted for its love amongst itself...inc continuing to treat a reinstated person as if they are still d/f
Further..all the time i was d/f i never stopped witnessing about j....so how can they announce that they are no longer one of j..w.. the statement is slanderous and there would be quite a few 'witnesses' to the fact although they would probably be silent witnesses if instructed