LMAO @ Elsewhere!
The "Bentinel" - only you could have come up with that name Dave, only you... Cheeky monkey
JW Quiz got Farked, viewed over 20,000 times! Huge # of comments!
by AlmostAtheist 43 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Euphemism
Dirty! Dirty! I feel so dirty!!!! I have to get it off!!! I have to get it off!!!
ITYM "Out damned spot"
-
Odrade
Brother Euphemism said my comment already, but in addition...
hehe.
Dave, can't wait to see your "answer" from Brooklyn about oral/anal. I wonder if they have a script for that one yet. Also, I wonder if the 52 y.o. virgin answering that particular telephone line might have a little problem after the discussion?
-
AlmostAtheist
Dave, can't wait to see your "answer" from Brooklyn about oral/anal. I wonder if they have a script for that one yet.
They did have an answer pretty quick! Probably has it on a post-it next to his phone. I just posted this on Fark:
I just got off the phone with some guy at the Writing Department at Watchtower. (718-560-5000) He referenced the March 15th 1983 Watchtower which condemned oral and anal sex as perverted and unclean, and pointed out that the same material was referenced back to in the November 1st 2000 Watchtower. He says the recent reference shows that it is still the current view.
It should be noted though that the article expressly says that oral sex between married people doesn't constitute "porneia" (Greek word for "fornication") and so would not be grounds for disfellowshipping. However any Witness engaging in any type of unclean conduct (such as oral sex) would not qualify for privileges in the congregation such as giving talks, being an elder, or "pioneering". To a Witness, those are major things, not something to be given up lightly.
So oral sex is forbidden, but it's not a DF'ing offense as best as I can tell.
Dave
Pretty soon you'll call the Watchtower and get a recording, "If you're calling about oral sex, press 1. If you think we're a cult, press 2. If you're a mind-controlled zombie calling to schedule a tour, press 3." There really wouldn't need to be any more options, that would cover everybody!
Dave