Running Man,
Hmmm. That's interesting. I actually wondered about that. But we fooled around with so many different versions of chess, and it didn't affect our normal chess games. It was like playing different games, like say, playing Bridge and then playing chess.
Another game we played was when we took a board and partitioned it off in the middle with another board, so that neither side could see the other's side. Then we could set up our pieces ANY WAY WE WANTED along the horizontal rows. When we both said we were ready, the middle partition was taken away, and all would be revealed. At that point, we started the game. If you put your pawns in the back and your powerful pieces in front, they were immediately mobile and could inflict a lot of damage. On the other hand, they were often more vulnerable, especially since white moves first. That was a fun game. We could also put two layers of pawns around the king and almost make him invincible. But it also immobilized the back pawns trapped by the ones in front. It all depends how your opponent sets up his pieces, which would be the best setup for you. But, of course, you can't see what your opponent has done until it is revealed.
Rod P.