Brain cancer of little girl cured with transfusion of killer T cells!

by Gill 10 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Gill
    Gill

    I watched the news this evening and there was a fantastic story about a little five year old girl who had been cured of her brain tumours with a transfusion of killer T-cells. Her tumours were caused by a virus. It is believed that, this being the first time a treatment like this has been used to kill cancer cells, (this was in Edinburgh, Scotland, by the way), but it is believed that this treatment may be considered to cure other cancers caused by virus' including liver and cervical cancer.

    It was wonderful to see this little girl so well and her parents happy faces.

  • EvilForce
    EvilForce

    I got this in one of my "medical" pop ups....

    From the Scotland Sunday Times

    SCOTTISH scientists have saved the life of an eight-year-old girl using a technique that brings new hope to thousands of cancer sufferers.

    Doctors involved in the pioneering treatment are hailing the technique as a major breakthrough in the treatment of lymphoma and other cancers caused by viruses.

    Alex Lowe had lapsed into a coma and was given just days to live after aggressive chemotherapy failed to cure brain tumours caused by a virus. In a last-ditch attempt to save her life, doctors turned to the experimental treatment developed by scientists at Edinburgh University. The technique uses a weekly transfusion of specially selected white blood cells — called killer T-cells — to target a specific cancer-causing virus.

    Dr Robert Wynn, a consultant haematologist at the Royal Manchester children’s hospital, where the schoolgirl was treated, said: “She was essentially dead. She was in a coma, her body showed signs that she was close to death with the tumour. We were expecting a respiratory arrest from which we would not have attempted to resuscitate her.

    “It is not too much to describe what happened as miraculous. She woke up and over the following months has returned to being a normal girl. She is back at school. She rides her bike. She can run. I have done lots of things in medicine but I have never seen anything like this girl.”

    Alex’s mother, Lindsay, 33, added: “It is absolutely remarkable. I was sat at her bedside waiting for her to die. Then they came along and gave her an infusion. Between the second and third week everything was a lot better.”

    A few months later doctors carried out a brain scan and found no sign of the tumours.

    “It had all gone,” she said. “The doctors could not believe what they were telling me. She is a walking miracle.”

    Alex, who lives near Wigan, suffered from an immune deficiency which meant her body was unable to defend her from the normally harmless Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

    Before Alex’s dramatic recovery, the treatment had only been used in patients who developed cancers after organ transplants. Transplant patients are at higher risk of developing cancer because their immune systems is weakened by drugs to stop their bodies rejecting the new organs.

    Its success in treating brain tumours caused by a virus has raised the prospect of the technique being adapted to attack other cancers — such as those suffered by patients with Aids — and related conditions such as Hodgkin’s disease.

    The method, which is less toxic than chemotherapy, could also be used to treat other virus-related tumours such as cancer of the cervix or liver.

    Alex’s treatment, which took place two years ago, has so astounded doctors that it has been reported in the current edition of the medical journal Lancet Oncology. A further 10 patients have received cell transfusions since she was treated.

    The white blood cells are chosen to attack a specific virus and are grown in huge numbers in culture to establish a bank of 100 different cell lines that are compatible with common tissue types. They are stored in a unique T-cell bank at Edinburgh University.

    “What is significant to us is that Alex was not a transplant patient, so it extends the usefulness of our treatment,” said Dorothy Crawford, professor of medical microbiology at Edinburgh University, who runs the T-cell bank. “We were delighted. It was such a dramatic treatment. If we show it works with this virus then maybe we can grow another bank for another virus. This is just the beginning.”

    Alex went on to have a bone-marrow transplant that corrected her immune deficiency. A tumour that grew after the transplant was also successfully treated with T-cell therapy. She may now even donate bone marrow to her brother Cory, 5, who has the same condition.

    Recalling her illness, Alex said: “I couldn’t walk, I couldn’t talk and I had to go in a wheelchair because I had been in a bed that long. If they hadn’t found the treatment for me I might have gone up in heaven.”

    Henry Scowcroft, senior science information officer at Cancer Research UK, which has funded the therapy, said: “It’s always great to see the results of the research we fund pay off in such a spectacular way, especially in a patient so young. Therapies like this one, which are highly specific but available ‘off- the-shelf’ so that they can be delivered to the patient quickly, have long been a goal of the cancer research community.”

  • Gill
    Gill

    Thanks EvilForce!

    A wonderful story to read. Brings new hope to so many people!

  • M.J.
    M.J.
    Brings new hope to so many people!

    Yes, except to Jehovah's Witnesses.

  • Gill
    Gill

    M.J. - That's a very sad thought. What concerns me is that I would have denied such a treatment to my own children only four years ago if they had needed it.

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    I am aware that JWs have accepted white blood cells before as documented by Sam Muromoto at AJWRB ... peripheral stem cell treatment ...(www.ajwrb.org)

    Maybe, just maybe, Major Spry at the Hospital Information Service will whip up some sort of spin to say that these T cells don't fit their definition of white blood cells and are thus, allowed to be taken by JWs ... consceince permitting of course ....

    It will be too bad if the the JW leadership prevents this use.

  • Gill
    Gill

    Hi hawkaw. Yes it would be too sad if they didn't allow it but how many JW confused consciences would allow it?

    I saw a little girl in Peru who was having surgery to have her legs separated, she was born with Mermaids syndrome.

    It was wonderful that the chances are she is going to be 'fixed'. But what if she were a JW child?

    I can honestly say, that having been a JW they promoted such a hysterical fear of infection from blood that I would have been too afraid as a dub to have allowed my child to have such surgery. I know I probably make myself sound thoroughly stupid but I was of the 'seriously brainwashed JW' class.

    Now I see such treatments and operations and think, 'Mr God, how wonderful'. Then, I would have thought,' If they tried to do that to my child, I'd leave the country and go into hiding before they practiced such god defying acts as blood transfusing my child'.

    As you can tell I can remember what it's like vividly to think in JW ways.

    I don't doubt that blood carrys risks...but so does crossing the road, and I still do it.

    I remember being terrified of taking the children to hospitals or doctors incase blood came up. And what if the kids were taken into care or made a ward of court?

    So much trauma being a JW and no peace.

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    I hear you Gill. Its tough to educate. I do not that AJWRB did do a survey and found at least 1/2 the JWs would quietly accpet a blood therapy once it was properly explained.

    I hope one day, this blood issue which I consider an apparent criminal negligence causing death along with the child abuse and shunning issues will stop.

    hawk

  • Gill
    Gill

    hawk - The thing with the blood issue and the shunning issue is that they are essentially amongst the core beliefs that the JWs take as their being different and better that other religions.

    No Blood

    No talking to JWs who leave

    No Birthdays

    No Christmas

    No Trinity

    No chaity etc

    Their lists of abstinences that mark themselves as different are all that make them different.

    If they really begin to give up any of these essentially different beliefs then the structures will crumble.

    I don't believe they will because they can't. It would be like shooting themselves in the foot.

    They may be able to change their 1914 doctrine and only just get away with it but No Blood.....I doubt it.

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    Very good points. I do note though that the blood doctrine, which is bible and unique science based, has changed dramatically from the 1960s. It will be interesting to see what happens over the next 20 years from the leadership.

    Take care

    hawk

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit