Does anyone know a good source(s) that refutes the Daniel book?

by Check_Your_Premises 9 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Check_Your_Premises
    Check_Your_Premises

    As some of you know, they are getting ready to go through the Daniel book.

    I don't want to attack the dumb ideas in the book.

    I would just like to be able to ask some troubling questions, so it doesn't all take.

    CYP

  • DevonMcBride
  • ozziepost
    ozziepost

    An excellent little booklet from the MacGregors!

    In Australia, it can be obtained from:

    Free in Christ Ministries

    P.O. Box 308

    Kingswood

    NSW 2747

    Telephone 02 4736 5293

    http://www.pnc.com.au/~fichrist

    Cheers, Ozzie

  • VM44
    VM44

    Comments From The Friends site has some pages about the Daniel book: --VM44

    "Daniel, the Watchtower's Egocentric View"

    http://cftf.com/daniel/index.html

  • Narkissos
  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    Farkels comments are also brilliant - can be found at www.freeminds.org and also somehwere on this site also I believe

  • Alwayshere
    Alwayshere

    A good source to refute the Daniel book is the Bible. The Daniel book contridicts the Bible.

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    New Daniel Book = More Problems

    All 3 messages in topic - view as tree
    " noWrap width="1%" bgColor=#b71c0c>Proplog2 Sep
    Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
    From: [email protected] (Proplog2) - Find messages by this author
    Date: 1999/09/04
    Subject: New Daniel Book = More Problems
    Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse

    More problems with the Daniel book. (Continuation of criticism)

    The date of 1914 has been a pivotal date for the Watchtower. A lot
    hinges on it. Russell counted down to 1914 and the Watchtower has
    been counting the years since 1914. The new Daniel book reaffirms
    he Watchtowers old mistakes with reference to this date.

    The overarching error in connection with the date of 1914 is not
    the debate over when the count of 2,520 years starts but whether
    there should be ANY counting of 2,520 years at all. On page 94 the
    question for paragraph 24 is:

    "The great dream tree symbolizes what?"

    The Daniel book says

    "the tree stands for rulership and sovereignty far grander than
    that of Babylon's king. It symbolizes the universal sovereignty of
    Jehovah...especially with respect to the earth."

    If you read the 4th Chapter of Daniel it says nothing specifically
    about the tree symbolizing the universal sovereignty of Jehovah.
    Since the 4th Chapter of Daniel doesn't say that the tree
    symbolizes the universal sovereignty of Jehovah it is THEREFORE
    presumptuous for the Watchtower to make that claim. The 4th
    chapter however doesn't leave the interpretation of the dream to
    our imagination. It tells us specifically what that tree
    represents. Daniel reveals the interpretation with these words at
    Daniel 4:22 "It is YOU O king". That's it. The tree represents
    Nebuchadnezzar. Any further elaboration of this simple explanation
    is pure speculation. The Watchtower is allowed to speculate but
    individual JW's are disfellowshipped if they question this
    Watchtower speculation.

    Next the Watchtower invokes an imaginary "rule" for interpreting
    prophecy.

    The question for paragraph 28 page 96:

    "What rule must be applied to the 2,520 days of the prophetic seven
    times?"

    The answer: "A day for a year." To support this "rule" they quote
    Ezekiel 4:6,7 and Numbers 14:34. Read those scriptures. There is
    nothing about them that suggests that there is some universal rule
    of using a day for a year when interpreting prophecies that mention
    a number of days. Once again this is speculation. It's no wonder
    they warn JW's about speculation. They seem to have a problem with
    the consequences of foolish speculation.

    But, suppose there really is a rule that you use a day for a year?
    How consistent are they in following that rule? Why don't they use
    that rule with Daniel 8:14 in counting the 2,300 days? Or what
    about the 1,290 days and 1,335 days in Daniel 12:11,12? Apparently
    this rule is not a rule at all!!

    The debate on 607BC is an interesting discussion but it is merely
    a side issue. Even if 607BC were the indisputable beginning to the
    70 year period of desolation there is no basis for counting 2,520
    years to some imagined point in the future when Christ begins to
    rule.

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    Problems with new Daniel Book

    Only 1 message in topic - view as tree
    " noWrap width="1%" bgColor=#b71c0c>Proplog2 Aug
    Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
    From: [email protected] (Proplog2) - Find messages by this author
    Date: 1999/08/22
    Subject: Problems with new Daniel Book
    Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse

    Fudge. That's the unofficial term for what you do with numbers
    when they don't exactly say what you want them to say.

    The Watchtower writers are either mathematically challenged or they
    are deliberate fudgers.

    Let's look at the day counting prophesies of Daniel.

    On page 301 of the New Daniel book we have the LATEST "truth" about
    the 1,260 days, the 2,300 evening and mornings, 1,290 days and the
    1,335 days.

    Ready to do some counting?

    The Chart "PROPHETIC TIME PERIODS IN DANIEL" (Will be referred to
    as the "Chart")

    "Three and a half times (1,260 days) Daniel 7:25; 12:7"

    "December 1914 to June 1918"

    Let's total the time span from December 1 1914 to June 30 1918

    December 1914 = 31 days
    1915 = 365 days
    1916 (Leap Year) = 366 days
    1917 = 365 days
    Jan 1- June 30 1918 = 1,318 days

    They allow a fudge factor of 58 days. Is Jehovah that sloppy with
    his prophecies? Shouldn't they know exactly when the 1,260 days
    begins and ends?

    Look at the type of event they use to mark the boundaries of these
    1,260 days.

    Page 142 Paragraph 29 Question for the paragraph "When and how did
    the prophetic three and a half years begin?

    "For the anointed Christians, World War I meant a time of testing.
    By the end of 1914, they were expecting persecution. In fact, the
    very yeartext chosen for 1915 was Jesus' question to his disciples,
    "Are ye able to drink of my cup?" It was based on Matthew 20:22,
    (KJV). Hence, beginning in December 1914, that small band of
    witnesses preached in "sackcloth".

    So at what point in December do you start counting? Do you start
    when some committee decided on the yeartext? Do you start when
    someone, on the committee that decides the yeartext, got the notion?
    Do you start counting from the time the plate is composed for
    printing the years text. Do you start from the publication date on
    the Watchtower that contains the yeartext? Somehow this doesn't
    seem like a good way to start counting a time period that is
    supposed to have some great prophetic significance.

    So when did the 1,260 days end? That's essentially the question
    asked in paragraph 31. The answer is as follows:

    "Harassment of God's anointed ones climaxed on June 21, 1918, when
    the president , J.F. Rutherford and prominent members of the Watch
    Tower Bible and Tract Society were sentenced on false charges to
    long prison terms... So the foretold period of "time, and times and
    half a time" ended in June 1918."

    If the period of mourning in sackcloth is supposed to end on June
    21, 1918 wouldn't that mean that the suffering ended? Instead it
    just began! That's when they were sentenced to jail. Apparently
    they were happy to receive prison suits as an exchange for their
    old sack cloth.

    Since they brought up the June 21st date as the time it ended it
    makes sense that we should be able to find the all important
    starting date by simply counting back 1,260 days. So let's do that.

    Jan 1- June 21 1918 = 172 days
    1917 = 365 days
    1916 = 366 days

    That totals up to 903 days

    1,260 - 903 = 357 days or January 8th 1915. That's not quite
    December 1914. Most likely the 1,260 days started from the day the
    local congregations got the banner of the yeartext displayed at
    their meeting places.

    I was going to work my way through the other dates. I just don't
    have the time. Maybe someone else can do that.

    I prefer my fudge in brownies.

  • Quotes
    Quotes

    Well, let me think....

    Methadone is used to treat Heroine addiction; Daniel was obviously on some pretty heavy stuff, so maybe if you can get this "Daniel" into a Methadone treatment clinic???

    ~Quotes, of the "sorry, just kidding" class

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit