Alright I will take a stab at some of the policies that cause the problem
Catholic Church policies that make molestation more likely:
In some cases when the Church found out a Preist was molesting children, they would simply re-assign the Preist to another parish.
Questions:
1. How did the Church determine abuse had occurred? Did the child or parent simply have to come forward with a complaint (vs. a 2 witness rule required by dubs)?
2. Did the Church contact law enforcement if not required by law?
3. Did the Church take any action or threat against a parent for pressing charges against the priest?
4. Did the Church become involved at all if there were molestation allegations between lay members of the parish? Did the Church take any action against or threats against members who pressed legal charges against other members?
5. Does the Church forbid members from informing others of pedophiles in the parish, for the purpose of protecting them?
JW Policies that make molestation more likely:
1. If a child is molested, and it is brought to the elders, they contact law enforcment ONLY if required by law.
2. If a child is molested, and there are not two witnesses to the act, the accused molestor is free from any organizational sanction.
3. If a child is molested, the JW will disfellowship anyone who presses charges against the alleged molester. (Is this correct?)
4. If a person is accused, and even found to be guilty by judicial committeeof molesting children, no person is allowed to inform other members of the congregation for the purposes of protecting them.
5. JW require that their members prostletyze. Therefore they send known pedophiles to the homes of an unknowing public.
Question:
1. I hear a great deal how whenever someone is disfellowshipped, "everyone knows why". Doesn't that same rumor mill, basically cause word to get around if there is a pedophile in the congregation?
2. When a child molester is accused, but not found guilty by J.C., do the elders try to "keep an eye on" the person to make sure he does not come in contact with children in the congregation?
3. When a child molester is found guilty by J.C., how do the elders prevent the person from coming in contact with the children of the congregation, without telling everyone of the persons proclivities?
4. How can they possibly know the extent to which a suspected or known pedophile has access to the children of the cong or out in field service, unless they follow him around constantly?