Please post pictures of the Ageing Governing Body and Helpers(Nethinim).

by frankiespeakin 19 Replies latest jw friends

  • MerryMagdalene
    MerryMagdalene

    The only pics I have of GB are from 1955...not exactly what you're looking for I know but does include Albert Schroeder singing Kingdom Songs w/Franz and Knorr. If you want me to post it I will...

    ~Merry

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    Merry,

    Thanks for the offer but more recent ones, are needed, ones that show them aged, and in need of being put to pasture, and not dictating how a person should live thier life, pictures that show them as they are now can be a real eye opener to lurkers.

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    I probably won't get too many pictures because of the very real threat to those that post them, in that they migh be identified and DF'd.

    But you might be able to post a picture if you have sent them to many of the friends you correspond with on the net, and thier by claim you didn't post them but it must have been some one else that got a hold of the pictures which you sent out to many of the friends.

  • heathen
    heathen

    Yah it's kinda funny how they change the generation dogma but still insist that the anointing was cut off in 1935 . Jeeze you know they could dress one of those old timers up in a funny white suit and hat and start calling him pope .

  • minimus
    minimus

    And to think that gullible Witnesses actually believe that these feeble mumbling old men can impart anything but a deposit in a Depends.

  • Sunspot
    Sunspot
    Jeeze you know they could dress one of those old timers up in a funny white suit and hat and start calling him pope

  • JV
    JV

    Check out sf's thread about ted jaracz, and you'll find a link to a "brothers" website, i know the guy, embarrassing is all i have to say. He'd totally do something like put up a lame website, anyways it's good for a laugh of two

  • dorayakii
    dorayakii
    He was definitely in no postion to hoard pedophiles or browse the UN library.

    LOOOOOL

    Yah it's kinda funny how they change the generation dogma but still insist that the anointing was cut off in 1935

    What is their "scriptural" reasoning on this date anyway? This "cutting-off" date for the annointed in 1935 was mentionned over and over again, but it seems completely unfounded on scripture. It seems that it was all based on some special talk that was given in the year. I always used to question this date when i was going tomeetings but i never got a satifying answer.

    here's a link to the page i think u were talking about: http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gb.htm

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    I really doubt that even Scholar with his twisted loyal JW logic would be able to come up with a scriptural reason why 1935 was a date set in stone 1914 + 21 years? 607 + 1 gaziilion years?

  • heathen
    heathen

    yah I can't remember all that mumbo jumbo on the anointing cutoff . I think it had something to do with the pentacost year . Anyone with info feel free to post . My point was that they did change a generation to mean any generation that witnesses the tribulation or some such thing . I even saw somebody post a belief that we are in the tribulation according to the WTBTS . I don't have a problem with the belief that some fall away from the faith and thus others are given opportunity because it is in line with the apostle writings , many are called yet few are chosen . To say that 1935 is a cutoff date is a bit of a stretch for me .

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit