“Christians are told to abstain from blood,” counters spokesman Clive Thomas. “We don't believe in a burning hell fire but we believe that somebody who has broken God's laws unrepentantly will meet God's unfavourable judgment. And that means they may not get to live in a paradise on earth.”This statement just get's my blood boiling. It sounds so grandious and dramatic to witnesses, like a f*cking installment in the Star Wars series, good vs. evil. Will this madness ever end??
Me too! Invoking an incomplete predicate as an independent construction is meaningless. It has to have a context. Didn't these idiots even attend school?
If a woman's OBGYN tells her that, "Pregnant women should abstain from alcohol," it means something entirely different than if a dermatologist tells this woman's husband that, "Persons with sensitive skin should abstain from alcohol."
We don't abstain from objects themselves, we abstain from finite acts done in connection with objects. In this case, she can still put it on her skin and he can still drink it.