THE WATCHTOWER publishes "no man's opinion".(WT 1931 November 1 p. 327; 1936 March 15 p. 85)
Watchtower12/1/81 p 27"Unless we are in touch with this channel of communication that God is using, we will not progress along the road to life, no matter how much Bible reading we do"
(On quote 1) But sadly, we know that the WTS does publish man's opinion, don't we? They have made foolish and dangerous mistakes that were to be understood as "food from God" and yet...........had to be revised and / or changed when these "mistakes" became evident! Thre is no way on earth that these "mere men" are not guilty of doing just exactly what they claim, as we have all seen. That makes them liars, and God hates liars.
God also hates cowards too, and the WTS has made many terrible and dangerous proclamations, teaching them as "bible truths", and many have lost their very lives over some of them. Others have lost their entire families and dear friends due to the hideous shunning policy when they didn't "go along with the program" .............and yet how many were apologized to when some stupid rule was changed? The WTS does not have the common human decency to even act as if they are sorry fr ALL the damage they have done over the years...........that was taught as that "food from God" and you had better follow it and OBEY what we say!!!!!!! They are the worst kind of cowards!
(On quote 2) The arrogant claim that THEY are this "channel of communication" from God himself, when they have clearly proven that they are NOT, makes everything they publish under suspicion because of all their past (and obviously unproven) edicts and those "rules of the day" policies!
HOW can anyone put their faith and trust in this obviously flawed and psuedo-religion that has been based on the guesswork of self-appointed "faithful and discreet" men?
How do you explain Psalm 146:3, in light of what the bible itself says?
DFed, you said that you were here to do some rattling-----and so am I. What say you to my observations and my questions?
Looking forward to see your answers,
Annie