Popes cousin a witness. Pope praises witnesses.

by PaNiCAtTaCk 18 Replies latest jw friends

  • AlmostAtheist
    AlmostAtheist

    My father-in-law is a dyed-in-the-fool dubby, not a rising-star type, but a happy-to-be-a-cog type. He has often rattled off "conversations" that he's had out in service that sound exactly like a Service Meeting demonstration. I can't prove these things didn't happen, but I know they didn't happen to me when I was a dub. Or anyone I was with. Certainly not with the regularity that they happen to him.

    So it makes me believe that people hear what they want to hear. Did the Pope say "You're doing the work we should be doing"? Or did he say, "You're doing a preaching work, that's good. We should all share our faith." My father-in-law would happily translate one to the other.

    So it appears that in addition to the JW lens through which they see the world, there is also a JW Babel Fish through which they hear.

    Dave

    Link
  • ozziepost
    ozziepost

    Someone musta been missing out on reading the board - this has already been done; just yesterday..

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/14/97475/1.ashx

    Link
  • BrendaCloutier
    BrendaCloutier

    Pope .... Babylon the grape .... Brownnosing JW-ism? Hmm. Dog sniffing dogbutt? That's what it sounds like, but I highly doubt it is anything other than a friendly call from a very happy proud El Papa (The Pope) to a childhood friend and cousin.

    I saw the photo'd article but this was easier to read.

    Link
  • jaffacake
    jaffacake

    The JW I studied with liked to boast about visiting my local Catholic priest, who naughtily used to use Watchtower articles in his sermons. What a load of rubbish - obvious distortion of conversations. People give JWs occasional patronising compliments so as not to offend or out of sympathy, and the JWs build them up into something else.

    If the pope is who and what they claim, why would they wish to publicise his comments? They obviously respect the papacy, they've been building a cpy of it for 80 years or more.

    Link
  • willy_think
    willy_think


    So let me get this straight,

    Satan's right hand man said the JW are great and should keep up the good work.....how encouraging....or maybe he is God's man and all is well....i'm so confused...

    Link
  • Jim_TX
    Jim_TX

    I dunno... *shakes head slowly* ... I see a joke in this somewhere...

    kinda goes like... "Is the Pope Catholic?"

    then ends like... "Is the Pope's cousin a JW?"

    you get the drift.

    Regards,

    Jim TX

    Link
  • badboy
    badboy

    WITH PRAISE LIKE THIS,WHO NEEDS JEHOVAH BLESSING?

    Link
  • badboy
    badboy

    DOES THIS PRAISE HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE FACT HE IS THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL AKA JESUS CHRIST

    Link
  • aqwsed12345
    aqwsed12345

    “Pepi on the Telephone”:How a Charming Anecdote Became the Internets Favourite Proof that a Pope Secretly Admired Jehovahs Witnessesand Why the Facts Say Otherwise

    In mid‑July2005, just three months after Cardinal JosephRatzinger emerged from the Sistine Chapel as PopeBenedictXVI, TheCanberraTimes ran a heart‑warming provincial story under the headline:

    Pope Remembers Steffie – “But he’s still just a naughty boy to me,” says Cooma cousin.

    The protagonist was StefanieBrzakovic, a seventy‑eight‑year‑old Jehovah’s Witness living in the Snowy‑Mountains town of Cooma, New South Wales. According to journalist MarkusMannheim, Benedict—whom she called “RatzingerPepi,” his supposed childhood nickname—had phoned her from the Vatican to reminisce about games they played as children in Bavaria. More startling still, the Pope allegedly praised Witness evangelism with words tailor‑made for a Kingdom‑Hall platform:

    “You are doing the work we should be doing. Your halls are small but full; our cathedrals are great and empty.”

    Within hours the article appeared on this discussion board, igniting twenty‑plus replies that ranged from delighted ( “So encouraging—spiritual goose‑bumps!”) to exasperated (“Great, now my parents will quote this for weeks”). Two decades on, the anecdote still circulates—often as irrefutable evidence that “even the Pope admitted Jehovah’s Witnesses are right.”

    Look past the sentimental glow, however, and the story collapses on four independent lines of evidence: genealogy, geography, linguistics, and documentary silence.

    1 | Genealogy: the paper trail that isn’t there

    BenedictXVI’s maternal ancestry is unusually well documented. Parish registers show a tight chain of Bavarian and South‑Tyrolean families:

    • MariaPeintnerRieger (18841963) – the Pope’s mother
    • IsidorRieger (18601912) – her father, an only child
    • Earlier generations: Reiss, Tauber, Peintner and Rieger stretching back to the 1780s

    Every baptism, marriage and burial is accounted for, and no branch ever wanders into the surnames Berger or Bartl.

    StefanieBrzakovic’s line, by contrast, begins with her mother KatharinaBerger (baptised 20August1894 in Garmisch). Church ledgers newly consulted in 2025 identify Katharina’s parents—Stefanie’s maternal grandparents—as JohannBerger and BarbaraBartl of nearby Farchant. That is as far as the documentary trail goes, but it is far enough: the Berger/Bartl pairing appears nowhere in the Ratzinger tree, and because IsidorRieger had no siblings, there is no collateral line through which Stefanie could be even a second cousin. The relationship is genealogically impossible.

    2 | Geography: the miles that refuse to shrink

    Stefanie told the CanberraTimes that the Ratzingers lived “about fifty kilometres away” and “often came over to play” in Weilheim. In reality:

    • The Ratzingers’ 1930s addresses—Tittmoning, AschauamInn, and Hufschlag near Traunstein—hug the south‑eastern fringe of Bavaria.
    • Weilheim, where Stefanie spent her school years, lies west of Munich, nearly 100kilometres from Traunstein by pre‑war roads.

    For rural families of modest means, that was not an afternoon hop; it was a full‑day journey involving two rail connections or a slow bus. No parish roll, market roster or school register shows the two clans sharing a district at the same time.

    3 | Linguistics: the nickname that rings false

    Anyone raised in Upper Bavaria will tell you that little Josephs are Sepp or, at most, Seperrl. Pepi is an Austrian‑Viennese diminutive, popular in Vienna but odd across the Inn River. Benedict’s authenticated cousin ErikaKopper, interviewed repeatedly in German media, always referred to the Pope as “Sepp.” That Stefanie’s memory produced the sole Austrian variant tips the story toward embellishment.

    4 | Déjà‑vu dialogue: Watchtower folklore repackaged

    The pièce de résistance—“You are doing the work we should be doing”—is not new. It appears verbatim in long‑running Witness folklore:

    • Watchtower, 15June1993: A Pentecostal pastor confesses identical envy.
    • Awake!, 8February1982 (recycled in Watchtower 1Jan1997): A minister says, “We have Holy Spirit, but you people do the work.”

    Veteran Witnesses recognise the pattern: respected clergyman privately concedes the superiority of house‑to‑house preaching. Stefanie’s account slots so neatly into that template that coincidence is improbable.

    5 | The silence that speaks loudest

    Had a reigning Pope praised Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Catholic press would have scrambled to clarify, the Witness press would have trumpeted it, and Vatican archivists would still guard an entry in the Papal Protocol. None of these things happened. The Watchtower—normally eager to publish even tepid compliments from clergy—never printed a line. The Holy See never acknowledged a call, invitation, or audience. The story survives only where fact‑checking never reaches: personal email chains, convention corridor whispers, and long‑forgotten message boards.

    Why the legend persists

    For many Witnesses the anecdote is irresistible: it flatters a minority community often caricatured as marginal by suggesting that even the world’s most prominent cleric secretly agrees with them. Because the organisation never endorsed the claim in print, it can circulate indefinitely with no institutional liability. It is the perfect “whisper story”: inspiring if believed, harmless if disproved, and—thanks to half‑remembered forum posts—strangely immortal.

    Verdict

    Every verifiable strand—ancestry, distance, dialect, publication history—contradicts StefanieBrzakovic’s charming recollection. What remains is a single, uncorroborated reminiscence whose dialogue mirrors decades‑old Watchtower tropes and whose geography folds under a road map. Far from demonstrating papal admiration, the saga of “RatzingerPepi” illustrates how easily religious communities generate legends that confirm the truths they already wish to hear—and how durable those legends become once emotion outruns evidence.

    Link

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit