Get over this persecution complex, sf. I'm not out to get you. I tried to speak to you in chat the other day to be friendly and you split without saying a word as soon as I showed up. Get over yourself.
Bwahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, are you serious? THAT'S exactly WHY! I am NOT an "authority" on this subject matter. Nor do I owe you ANY explanation as to the WAY I post ANY type of text on ANY subject matter; no matter what it is.
What on earth are you talking about? I wasn't directing my comments toward you, but toward the excerpts you quoted. And yes, I am serious. I would like to see material on this subject done in a sober, serious manner, as if someone who has proof is talking. That is what I mean by authoritative. The way a doctor would speak to you when describing an ailment you have, for instance.
This is seriously becoming amusing "Seeker". Thewayyou are on my back. Waiting on every breath I utter.
Uh, this isn't your thread, is it? I commented on what the original poster said. And then when you posted some material, I commented on the material. I'm not on your back.
Why is this?
Um, paranoia? I dunno, you'll have to answer that one.
Why does it concern you so much,that you spend this energy jumping me at every chance you get?
I already explained the damage you do to me. Weren't you listening?
So what if I post a messae and it isn't "authoritive" enough for you. Why is what i am "seeking" such a problem for you?
I would be fascinated if you were right. I have nothing against any of these ideas. I just wish someone who knew how to write were presenting the information.
Are you afraid....of what I may encounter or discover? Am I "on to something", and you want to just shut me up? Or is it something ENTIRELY other than this "backjumping" you seem to have made a habit of?
Paranoia. I'm not afraid of anything. I seek truth, and that can encompass anything. Are you onto something? I dont' think so. I've read the same material, and found it lacks authority. It's not believable. But if it were true, I would be fascinated.
As for backjumping you, I'm not doing that any more. I said my piece, you rudely ignored me, and now I've moved on. However, this is a discussion board, and when someone else posted something about Russell that is old news, I said so. Then you jumped in after I posted my message to edit your message with a bunch of material. I saw the material and mused out loud about how I can never find Illuminati writing that is written well. You took this as a personal attack, although you weren't the one who wrote the material. Paranoia.
Is everything on "DIRTY WATCHTOWER SECRETS" a total and UTTER lie by Mr. Howard and others whocontribute to this topic? Just EXACTLY what is 100 percent FALSE about this site "seeker"
Did you read what I wrote? I am complaining about the lack of believability in style of this stuff. If there was proof, it would be offered, complete with citations you could check yourself. Instead we get anecdotes, just like the Watchtower. That's not a good pattern to be following.
Hate me all you want; I don't hate you. I hate what you do to me, but I don't take it personally. We are on the same side; we want the same goals. I just have a different standard of truth than you use. To each his or her own. You go your way, I go mine. But as long as we use the same discussion board, you and I will both be discussing topics that interest us both. Deal with it.
For the record, I would love it if the Illuminati were true. I just haven't seen anything you've posted that carries the ring of truth. After being burned by the Watchtower, I'm very careful to check my sources now. I'll not be fooled again.