I have to agree with steve2 - your previous response, Umbertoecho, is totally unwarranted.
You made a big issue of this company not being on some official list and I asked a reasonable question of "where is that list" then you PM me to say it's all secret and can't and won't be shared.
Fair enough about the anger inside of me. And taken on board.
As to you Simon. Asking me for personal information is presumptuous. Who are you really?. I don't know you I don't even know your real name. So why should I trust you when you could be anyone.? If you had the right to know, then you would have gone through the process and be fully informed of what the next, best move would be.
Simon. who are you? A moderator? Do you really think this gives you the right to ask me to tell you things that are really none of your business? No. You have no right to ask and then subtly imply I am being furtive in some way.
Did you initiate this RC. No. Where you ever a part of it? No. So you don't have the right to ask. It seems downright ghoulish.
As to Lee Elder: To him I apologise for being well, basically rude. That is not on.
But how can anyone assume for one second that any person/victim that the RC has on their records will be doled out to lawyers looking for a quick buck. It won't happen. The RC has those very personal records.
The public documents, if you care to read them...........Are witness lists and a few manuals, letters and internal documents. They detail the public hearing they deal with the two cases that were used to support that part of the hearing. That's it.
The RC continues for two more years yet. That is a long time and a good time to gather as much information as possible. No need to jump the gun and start a litigation without waiting to see what a thorough analysis will deliver. Much better to wait and then, armed to the hilt.........go for the attack legally. Not one second before.
