Enough said.
However. Could you give me your personal details for you have mine? Your safety is in your anonymity. Nothing to be afraid of considering you initiated this site. What's your real name Simon, email address, photo..... details please
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
Enough said.
However. Could you give me your personal details for you have mine? Your safety is in your anonymity. Nothing to be afraid of considering you initiated this site. What's your real name Simon, email address, photo..... details please
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
I am not asking for any personal information. You posted that people should beware because this company isn't on some official list.
Answer: Yes you were.! No matter how you tried to sweeten that up.. You wanted to know about the RCs approved list. I said you could not have it..
It now seems that you are saying there is no official list. I don't understand the concept of an official list that no one can access.
Answer: Oh that 's priceless. You are almost stamping your feet and it just won't work
So what was the big deal? Why couldn't you just say that when first asked? All you had to say was "there is no official list of law firms that people are limited to dealing with". That is what I was asking - whether there was and if so where people could find it.
Answer: There is. It's just none of your business. Ring the RC and see how far you get. You will be stonewalled.
Answer: Any lawyer that wishes to create a class action will seek this information.
Everyone has the right to ask anyone else to explain or expand on what they said
Answer: That does not give them and especially you, the right to get these particulars. You may have set this site up, but you have no right to this information. Call the RC for it and see what happens.
What on earth are you on about? I was simply asking in order to help you to explain yourself better.
Answer: Not true. You thought you had the right to this information and you are angry because I will not give it to you. Moderator or not. You are still just a person who is not actively involved. You really showed your high-minded approach because I said it's..... None of your business.
Who is assuming that? If someone choses to go to a law firm and give then information then that is their concern
Answer: This is exactly the sort of limited thinking that someone like you would support. And it is exactly what should not be encouraged. It will do harm.
So what was the big deal? Why couldn't you just say that when first asked? All you had to say was "there is no official list of law firms that people are limited to dealing with". That is what I was asking - whether there was and if so where people could find it.
Answer: Because you asked me for information about this. Or should I say you wheedled on about information and "clarity". You thought you had the right to ask and now you can't handle being told to butt out. So we are back to square one. You are not giving any testimony. You think you deserve to ask, then when rejected.........you go all out to undermine....Brilliant show of stupidity.
And who the hell are you anyway. You have a site. But zero insight and just want trashy headlines. Who are you that I should trust a pseudonym?
Back off.
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
I have to agree with steve2 - your previous response, Umbertoecho, is totally unwarranted.
You made a big issue of this company not being on some official list and I asked a reasonable question of "where is that list" then you PM me to say it's all secret and can't and won't be shared.
Fair enough about the anger inside of me. And taken on board.
As to you Simon. Asking me for personal information is presumptuous. Who are you really?. I don't know you I don't even know your real name. So why should I trust you when you could be anyone.? If you had the right to know, then you would have gone through the process and be fully informed of what the next, best move would be.
Simon. who are you? A moderator? Do you really think this gives you the right to ask me to tell you things that are really none of your business? No. You have no right to ask and then subtly imply I am being furtive in some way.
Did you initiate this RC. No. Where you ever a part of it? No. So you don't have the right to ask. It seems downright ghoulish.
As to Lee Elder: To him I apologise for being well, basically rude. That is not on.
But how can anyone assume for one second that any person/victim that the RC has on their records will be doled out to lawyers looking for a quick buck. It won't happen. The RC has those very personal records.
The public documents, if you care to read them...........Are witness lists and a few manuals, letters and internal documents. They detail the public hearing they deal with the two cases that were used to support that part of the hearing. That's it.
The RC continues for two more years yet. That is a long time and a good time to gather as much information as possible. No need to jump the gun and start a litigation without waiting to see what a thorough analysis will deliver. Much better to wait and then, armed to the hilt.........go for the attack legally. Not one second before.
way to early on a saturday morning we got a ring on our doorbell.
someone else answered the door.
after they left i walked by our entry way and gagged from the smell!
That's it, guys. I'm off to the shops covered in Dune, my favourite from gay Paris, then a good old roll in some stinking seaweed, a cigar should also help me to get as much rejection as I could dream of in my lifetime. All I have to do is stink. Great.
I thought this was going to be about some interesting topic too, just as Crofty did. Instead, it's about smells. Have a good whiff of the air. Lead-free petrol can hardly be discerned anymore.........guess what? Lead levels have increased since "lead-free" or should I say, lead-free is just anther name for..."None smelly lead". .. How ironic is that.?
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/abused-brother-shunned-jehovahs-witnesses-10233281.
this poor girl was abused by her "non-jw" (never baptised ?
) brother, then was totally abused by the jw elders by their lack of care for her in any way, and then by her jw family, read the in-depth article, link above..
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
Now there is a shocker The Royal Commission has provided them with reams of evidence. Should be fun to sit back and watch the dominoes fall. You shall reap what you sow.
Switch that laugh to the other side of your idiotic face. No names, no inside info available to those outside. Are you bloody stupid.? Think your clever hey?
Piss off
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
Okay people, contact made, I'll send a fax, carrier pigeon and Morse Code next.
Let's see what happens hey?
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
This is the last serious caution.
Anyone who is serious about this matter would not touch this form of legal action. It will do harm. It is headline grabbing and that is all it is. No good will come out of it. It will cheapen the whole reason for the RC. So stop dead in your tracks before you get carried away.
Recall the RC?. It functioned calmly, with detail and with evidence. This is a cheap shot. It is risky to pre-empt the advice that will come to "genuine" victims, from those best equipped with full knowledge.
Recall: The RC with the legal genius of Angus Stewart? He discredited Applewaite on her weak and incredible claims of "expertise" before she got out of the bloody holding pen. No race that day, she was completely discredited. That was impressive and heart stoppingly well done. It was a brillaint move. I would want this intelligent and accurate set of people on my side any day. Not some crap cheap shot lawyer who doesn't care.
This RC was instituted to do a thorough, legal, humanitarian investigation into this religion (amongst many) It is set up to deliver a good and honest result.
I am going to phone these bastards and ask the hard question. I know the answer already.
meleti has not been wrong so far.
if anything he can be too cautious.
have a read of his last post on a wt study this week past.
Meleti has not been wrong so far. If anything he can be too cautious. Have a read of his last post on a WT study this week past.
I should make a lot of you pretty content. Just scroll quickly to where he quits with the analytics and into what he has heard and trusts.