I am not asking for any personal information. You posted that people should beware because this company isn't on some official list.
Answer: Yes you were.! No matter how you tried to sweeten that up.. You wanted to know about the RCs approved list. I said you could not have it..
It now seems that you are saying there is no official list. I don't understand the concept of an official list that no one can access.
Answer: Oh that 's priceless. You are almost stamping your feet and it just won't work
So what was the big deal? Why couldn't you just say that when first asked? All you had to say was "there is no official list of law firms that people are limited to dealing with". That is what I was asking - whether there was and if so where people could find it.
Answer: There is. It's just none of your business. Ring the RC and see how far you get. You will be stonewalled.
Answer: Any lawyer that wishes to create a class action will seek this information.
Everyone has the right to ask anyone else to explain or expand on what they said
Answer: That does not give them and especially you, the right to get these particulars. You may have set this site up, but you have no right to this information. Call the RC for it and see what happens.
What on earth are you on about? I was simply asking in order to help you to explain yourself better.
Answer: Not true. You thought you had the right to this information and you are angry because I will not give it to you. Moderator or not. You are still just a person who is not actively involved. You really showed your high-minded approach because I said it's..... None of your business.
Who is assuming that? If someone choses to go to a law firm and give then information then that is their concern
Answer: This is exactly the sort of limited thinking that someone like you would support. And it is exactly what should not be encouraged. It will do harm.
So what was the big deal? Why couldn't you just say that when first asked? All you had to say was "there is no official list of law firms that people are limited to dealing with". That is what I was asking - whether there was and if so where people could find it.
Answer: Because you asked me for information about this. Or should I say you wheedled on about information and "clarity". You thought you had the right to ask and now you can't handle being told to butt out. So we are back to square one. You are not giving any testimony. You think you deserve to ask, then when rejected.........you go all out to undermine....Brilliant show of stupidity.
And who the hell are you anyway. You have a site. But zero insight and just want trashy headlines. Who are you that I should trust a pseudonym?
Back off.
