exWTslave I think you are trying to say something, nut you must try a little bit harder for your system to have coherence, For example you say
Now you try the same life-style—make your life your message—doing good for the sake of goodness.
What if I choose to make my life my message by doing evil for the sake of evil, because that's what makes my life more meaningful and enjoyable. Wouldn't I still be godlike?
Then you say
the human mind transcends matter to some extent
well it may or it may not. Anyway quantum physics has nothing to do with that question, ok? And your "In other words" is just a way to avoid solid argument (which doesn't exist in this case).
But my favourite is
"Cognition presupposes duality"
Let me show the fallacy of this statement. If the consciousness of one's self required the seperation of the subject and the object, the same would be true about the consciousness of the consciousness of one's self (ie beeing aware of the consciousness of your own self). That type of awareness would require triality. Even worse the awareness of the consciousness of the consciousness of one's self would reqire Quadrality, and so on, till infinity.
New Age type Buddism isn't bud, but when you mess it with real sciense things start to get screwed..