They have a license to "spiritualize" any scripture to suit themselves. They also wantonly take scriptures that are obviously  spiritual or illustrative and deem them to be literal.
It's good to be a cult leader.
the searcher brought this scripture up on another thread:.
(1 timothy 5:8) "certainly if anyone does not provide for those who are his own, and especially for those who are members of his household, he has disowned the faith and is worse than a person without faith.
" [disowned jehovah].
They have a license to "spiritualize" any scripture to suit themselves. They also wantonly take scriptures that are obviously  spiritual or illustrative and deem them to be literal.
It's good to be a cult leader.
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.
"The bastards asked me a question" 😄
Classic!
for those of you that are into activism you may enjoy this special report video.
here's the description from the jwstruggle youtube channel:.
my buddy joel the unwitness recently went undercover at a kingdom hall, armed with a notebook, regular clothes, and an american standard bible.
Kinda like an apostate version of Drunk Hishtory.
Seriously though, no surprises there as to the responses he got from drones at the hall, pretty typical, "deny, deny, deny" response from the elder re shunning.
He could of said it quicker, but otherwise interesting.
did anyone notice this wt's subtle attack on wikipedia?
they wrote (from the 2011 yearbook of jehovah's witnesses, pp.
9-10. source: 'tracing all things with accuracy'):.
We can likely expect a lot more sites to be dissed by the WT as unreliable in the future.
Most witlesses I know, won't be able to help themselves exploring the information highway now the org is onli
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.
@stuck - "that's a bit harsh.....I liked the purple scarfe the main guy was wearing..."
Yeah, I spose you're right, metaphorical "roadkill" or not, it seems a shame to waste a cute scarfe.
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.
Trolley witnessing?
Try trolley roadkill!
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.
you don't have to know much to talk to jw's and show them they don't want to really discuss the matters.they consider a discussion on the matter they are pushing to be "confrontational.".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfw_txpmsj8.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqtadagucq.