Jehovah's Witnesses don't just have a dress policy they have a all gays are wicked and worthy of destruction policy.
In fact now, they have a secret all people that look or act gay are unworthy to represent us policy.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
Jehovah's Witnesses don't just have a dress policy they have a all gays are wicked and worthy of destruction policy.
In fact now, they have a secret all people that look or act gay are unworthy to represent us policy.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
I see it as the WT trying passive -aggressively to create a hostile environment for anyone they don't like.
Message to all the sisters with "masculine hairstyles": if an elder approaches you about your hairstyle feel free to get him in a headlock and punch him in the junk.
i ask, "did god cause evil?
god did it!
whether they answer with #1 or #2, you've got them.
I'm glad you have had success with this method, but sadly and frustratingly, the JWs I have attempted to reason with have no problem whatsoever contradicting themselves, the bible or their own publications.
I have concluded that fully indoctrinated people are contradiction-blind and inconsistency-deaf.
Ok, so we probably all are to some degree, but dubs make an artform out of it.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
How the hell with individual elders interpret girly mannerisms and butch hairstyles?
The other thing is, most elders I have known would not have the guts required to take this issue up with anyone, so what will they do just have vague local needs parts not specifically mentioning anyone?
How the hell do you enforce rules on stuff like body language and a person's speaking voice for god sake?
Will the elders start having deep-voice lessons for all gay-sounding brothers?
Just think about it, people.
I'd call it impossible to enforce such dumb-ass rules.
jehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
Boo-yeah, almost poetic in it's ironic justice.
Just the thought of YHWH servin up a whole bunch-a-beef to the Borg via worldly lawyers (spit) and saying
"...BTW, dirtbags, my name IS NOT JEHOVAH!"
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
The more the elders become style-nazis the more people will wake up.
At some point you have to ask yourself if this religion is worth all this shit.
For many JWs this may be their personal tipping point.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
I suppose dressing like a pedophile will be ok then.
In fact, isn't the pedo punishment more field service!
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
I only see a win-win here.
Elders harass certain individuals over their dress and grooming (nothing new about that.)
Certain individuals get pissed off over it, wake up to ttatt and leave =win for the individual.
If certain individuals do not comply they are not allowed to go in field service =win for the individiual (yaaay no fs!)
when somebody posted this on fb, i was anxious to see how ridiculous it would be, probably worse then the gb prophecies, etc.
after watching the clip, i honestly don't know what to believe.
at the very least it's very entertaining and interesting.
......
Whether you're a brother or whether you're a mother
You're stayin alive, stayin alive
Feel the city breakin and everybody shakin
and we're stayin alive, stayin alive
Ah, ah ah ah stayin alive.....
i remember that every time when my father and i came home from the meeting, my mother (who stayed at home for my disabled brother) asked us "who was attending and who wasn't attending".. and then, we took some time to drink coffee and went through the list who was there and who wasn't.
there after there was an opinion made why someone was absent and what this meant in relation with his strength of believe.. just curious, do you recognize this?
gorby.