CC - sorry if I misunderstand, but, are you saying commenting on apostate websites is not a dfing offense at the moment but it will be in the future?
sparrowdown
JoinedPosts by sparrowdown
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
sparrowdown
Are we there yet, are we there yet? Hmmm, seems not.
Oh well, here goes nothing.
1) JWs are a soul-sucking, family-destroying, xenophobic, homophobic, mysogynistic, pedo- protecting cult.
2) Any self-respecting "metrosexual" or anyone who values personal freedom - run, run as fast as you can away from this cult.
3) Please stop thinking representing a cult in public or door to door is a personal right worth fighting for -it's not.
Drop the mic.
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
sparrowdown
The WT wouldn't want evidence to get in the way of a good witch hunt. -
56
Today's watchtower: obey us, no matter what
by Tornintwo intoday's watchtower:.
obey us, obey us even when it seems strange, obeying our man made hierarchy equates to obeying god, sacrifice your own interests, work for us, don't be independent, put your own interests aside, obey some more, preach for us, build for us, enjoy it, obey some more, forgive when we are jerks to you and mistreat you, accept your changed assignment even if it seems cruel and doesn't make sense, don't complain if we move you (eg.
) because you might have to move in the new world, remember you are being trained to obey, remember to put your own interests aside, that's the way we are designed to live - it will only make you happy!
-
-
sparrowdown
They are as predictable as a cuckoo clock -emphasis on the cuckoo.
-
16
Proof that the lingiusts are lying about words used in the bible IE: Shaddai, Angels, Elohim, Yhwh?
by Crazyguy inin 1967 an archeologist found at tell el-deir alla an inscription that they called the book of balaam son of beor.
this looks to be about the same balaam that's talked about in the bible book of numbers.
remember the guy where his donkey is talking to him.
-
-
sparrowdown
Those cunning linguists. -
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
sparrowdown
Jehovah's Witnesses don't just have a dress policy they have a all gays are wicked and worthy of destruction policy.
In fact now, they have a secret all people that look or act gay are unworthy to represent us policy.
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
sparrowdown
I see it as the WT trying passive -aggressively to create a hostile environment for anyone they don't like.
Message to all the sisters with "masculine hairstyles": if an elder approaches you about your hairstyle feel free to get him in a headlock and punch him in the junk.
-
30
The Bible can help JWs to stop judging homosexuals. Try this method.
by DATA-DOG ini ask, "did god cause evil?
god did it!
whether they answer with #1 or #2, you've got them.
-
-
sparrowdown
I'm glad you have had success with this method, but sadly and frustratingly, the JWs I have attempted to reason with have no problem whatsoever contradicting themselves, the bible or their own publications.
I have concluded that fully indoctrinated people are contradiction-blind and inconsistency-deaf.
Ok, so we probably all are to some degree, but dubs make an artform out of it.
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
sparrowdown
How the hell with individual elders interpret girly mannerisms and butch hairstyles?
The other thing is, most elders I have known would not have the guts required to take this issue up with anyone, so what will they do just have vague local needs parts not specifically mentioning anyone?
How the hell do you enforce rules on stuff like body language and a person's speaking voice for god sake?
Will the elders start having deep-voice lessons for all gay-sounding brothers?
Just think about it, people.
I'd call it impossible to enforce such dumb-ass rules.
-
63
AUSTRALIA – Artemis Legal launches inquiry into group and class action lawsuits against Jehovah’s Witnesses
by jwleaks injehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
-
-
sparrowdown
Boo-yeah, almost poetic in it's ironic justice.
Just the thought of YHWH servin up a whole bunch-a-beef to the Borg via worldly lawyers (spit) and saying
"...BTW, dirtbags, my name IS NOT JEHOVAH!"