Well, he did spend more time writing about a common thief than he did about someone who raised a man from the dead...at least according to history...ironic eh?
Maat13
JoinedPosts by Maat13
-
5
The Josephus Problem
by HowTheBibleWasCreated insomeone made a comment today that josephus cannot be trusted as a historical source.
they are right or half right.
obviously josephus was a self-centered historian.
-
-
-
266
There Was No First Human
by cofty inthis excellent 4 minute video will help to clear up a few common misunderstandings regarding evolution.. ....
-
-
Maat13
you don't evolve from something that still exists...
"That's exactly how evolution works. It's been observed in action."
A controlled experiment?...did you observe it? .how complex was the species? what were the conditions under which this "evolution" took place? And no, that is not how evolution works...so now evolution is selective within one species? Is evolution a disease and is only susceptible by some within one species and not others within the same species? This can't be your argument....I mean really...where's the proof?
Either there was a phenomenonal mutation (which wipes out the previous species) or an implementation of a new a species all together.
"That's exactly the opposite of how evolution works."
An evolution is a change, gradually. A mutation is a change, albeit a drastic one. Once the change has occurred, the previous entity no longer exists.
Fish are still here..and if only some species of fish "evolved", why not all species of fish?
"Back up. Explain why you think all fish would evolve into a new species at the same time?"
I don't purport to say anything about fish evolving...I'm merely phrasing a question...which you did not answer....
More importantly, why was there a need to evolve? A message like the one presented provides no insight into this fundamental question. Darwin failed miserably at it. And I challenge any evolutionist to show proof of a NEED for humans to have evolved from any other species that lived on this planet.
"To survive under changing environmental conditions, for one. But, in any event, populations change over time, regardless, that's a fact. It just IS. Need may not have anything to do with it."
What environmental conditions? Water is now 2/3 of this planet. I'm quite sure millions of years ago it was more. What would cause a fish to come out from an environment that encompassed nearly the entire planet? Nature was never and will never be "Just IS". Nature is purposeful. If there is no need, Nature doesn't and will not ever alter because it wants to...that's man way of thinking.
Maat
-
266
There Was No First Human
by cofty inthis excellent 4 minute video will help to clear up a few common misunderstandings regarding evolution.. ....
-
-
Maat13
Viviane,
great question...
you don't evolve from something that still exists...
Either there was a phenomenonal mutation (which wipes out the previous species) or an implementation of a new a species all together. Fish are still here..and if only some species of fish "evolved", why not all species of fish?
More importantly, why was there a need to evolve? A message like the one presented provides no insight into this fundamental question. Darwin failed miserably at it. And I challenge any evolutionist to show proof of a NEED for humans to have evolved from any other species that lived on this planet.
Maat
-
266
There Was No First Human
by cofty inthis excellent 4 minute video will help to clear up a few common misunderstandings regarding evolution.. ....
-
-
Maat13
It's amazing what folks will do to push a thought.
the video that started this thread is complete garbage.
Maat
-
21
Convention handbill: Very Illuminati
by pixel innew handill for convention: see the relationship here: http://www.jw.org/en/publications/.
note: i'm not saying the wt is part of the illuminati, just noticing the use of "a world goverment"..
-
-
Maat13
Reference material for the one world religion..
"Fire in the Minds of Men" James Billington
"To Eliminate the Opiate" Rabbi Antelman
Maat
-
21
Convention handbill: Very Illuminati
by pixel innew handill for convention: see the relationship here: http://www.jw.org/en/publications/.
note: i'm not saying the wt is part of the illuminati, just noticing the use of "a world goverment"..
-
-
Maat13
for a moment there I thought I was on a hacked site!!! This hanbill is proudly displayed on JW.org!!! This is too darn predictable for a 100year anniversary of an organization preaching from a bible titled NEW WORLD translation...if this handbill is real, then the predictions made about this organization more than 50years ago is coming to fruition....sublime message of one world religion...
WOW...unbelievable....this kinda stuff makes conspiracy theorist look like prophets....laughable
Maat
-
6
The Easter Challenge
by Maat13 inhas anyone solved it?
the easter challenge was apparently proposed by dan barker (circa 1991).
his challenge was quite simple and reasonable.
-
-
Maat13
Comments are welcomed....
Maat
-
6
The Easter Challenge
by Maat13 inhas anyone solved it?
the easter challenge was apparently proposed by dan barker (circa 1991).
his challenge was quite simple and reasonable.
-
-
Maat13
Comments are welcomed....
Maat
-
6
The Easter Challenge
by Maat13 inhas anyone solved it?
the easter challenge was apparently proposed by dan barker (circa 1991).
his challenge was quite simple and reasonable.
-
-
Maat13
Bumped.....Any takers?
Maat
-
112
Why are JWs so afraid of apostates?
by Magnum inwhy are jws so afraid of apostates?
their view of apostates seems to be out of the realm of the ordinary, the natural.
its as if the words of apostates are supernatual or spiritistic as if apostates are some kind of jedi knights who can slightly wave their hands or twitch their eyes and bring one under a spell.
-
-
Maat13
Marked