Just wondering how many others (when you were still in the org) would try and listen to the meeting programmes from the perspective of a newly interested person visiting for the first time?
I know that I did this, and most times I did, I found it disturbing!
It was not just the "in-house" language and terminology that was odd, but also the actual doctrines, and method of 'teaching' that was odd!
I would wonder to myself "Why does a newly interested person actually sit through this and not find it strange, or just leave??"
Thoughts?