Did anyone read Margaux's story?
berrygerry
JoinedPosts by berrygerry
-
-
-
-
26
Luke 12:45 - Does that mean the F&D can go "bad"?
by thedepressedsoul inthe more i read the gospels the more i get the feeling that jesus warns about organized religion or those that overbear on your faith telling you completely how to worship god.
let's say luke chapter 12 is talking about the f&s.
does vs 45 on mean that the f&s can turn bad so to speak?
-
-
berrygerry
Mt. 24:48 reads "if THAT slave".
To me the explanation given in 2013 has given a lot of pause for thought.
There is ZERO discussion as to whether or not the slave, the GB, has acted evilly, beating his fellow slaves. (Should we start the list and risk crashing this website and maybe even the internet with overload?)
Instead, it is argued that the slave has not stopped giving food.
Which then makes the slave "hypothetical."
The word hypothetical is used ONCE in the whole WT Library when talking about an illustration or parable.
-
15
New Light - I've figured it out (and it's mine so don't you 'tates steal my royalties or MY followers - they belong to me [evil maniacal laughter] )
by berrygerry inso, we continue to face mounting challenges with 607 vs 587 (20 year differential), and the generation dying out.. therefore, after a personal (420 free - honest) research and revelation, it would appear that 587 is the correct launch date.. with respect to the 7 times, russell had been influenced by john a. brown into using a year of 360 days, when prescience would most surely indicate that at the time of discovery (2014) one would use the number of days of that respective calendar, i.e.. 365 1/4 days, an additional 5.25 days per year.. so, 7 x 5.25 = 36.75, which, using the biblical principle of rounding down, is 36 years.
(a day for a year).. adding the 20 year differential to the 36 years now gives us 56 years, which when added to 1914 ce, brings us to 1970 ce.. when we ask the god google, the significance of 1970, it tells us that earth day began 4/22/1970 (note not 4/20).. and who came to the aid of the woman (rev.
was it not the earth?.
-
-
berrygerry
The real question is: "Apocalypse Delayed was published in 1985. What have I been doing for 29 years?"
-
15
New Light - I've figured it out (and it's mine so don't you 'tates steal my royalties or MY followers - they belong to me [evil maniacal laughter] )
by berrygerry inso, we continue to face mounting challenges with 607 vs 587 (20 year differential), and the generation dying out.. therefore, after a personal (420 free - honest) research and revelation, it would appear that 587 is the correct launch date.. with respect to the 7 times, russell had been influenced by john a. brown into using a year of 360 days, when prescience would most surely indicate that at the time of discovery (2014) one would use the number of days of that respective calendar, i.e.. 365 1/4 days, an additional 5.25 days per year.. so, 7 x 5.25 = 36.75, which, using the biblical principle of rounding down, is 36 years.
(a day for a year).. adding the 20 year differential to the 36 years now gives us 56 years, which when added to 1914 ce, brings us to 1970 ce.. when we ask the god google, the significance of 1970, it tells us that earth day began 4/22/1970 (note not 4/20).. and who came to the aid of the woman (rev.
was it not the earth?.
-
-
berrygerry
I'm reading Apocalypse Delayed.
It doesn't say why Brown chose 360, but he went from 604 BCE to 1917.
Barbour thought Brown was 2 years off, and went to 1914.
Russell was convinced with Barbour's reasoning, and kept it after their split.
I like the comment in the Revelation Climax book regarding the overlooked 0 year factor:
"Providentially, those Bible Students had not realized that there is no zero year between "B.C." and "A.D." Later, when research made it necessary to adjust B.C. 606 to 607 B.C.E., the zero year was also eliminated, so that the prediction held good at "A.D. 1914."
So, it's not wrong light - it's just bent. And science has demonstrated that light can be bent.
JeffT, if you have demonstrated repentance, you may be reinstated, but your tithe rate will be 30% during probation.
-
15
New Light - I've figured it out (and it's mine so don't you 'tates steal my royalties or MY followers - they belong to me [evil maniacal laughter] )
by berrygerry inso, we continue to face mounting challenges with 607 vs 587 (20 year differential), and the generation dying out.. therefore, after a personal (420 free - honest) research and revelation, it would appear that 587 is the correct launch date.. with respect to the 7 times, russell had been influenced by john a. brown into using a year of 360 days, when prescience would most surely indicate that at the time of discovery (2014) one would use the number of days of that respective calendar, i.e.. 365 1/4 days, an additional 5.25 days per year.. so, 7 x 5.25 = 36.75, which, using the biblical principle of rounding down, is 36 years.
(a day for a year).. adding the 20 year differential to the 36 years now gives us 56 years, which when added to 1914 ce, brings us to 1970 ce.. when we ask the god google, the significance of 1970, it tells us that earth day began 4/22/1970 (note not 4/20).. and who came to the aid of the woman (rev.
was it not the earth?.
-
-
berrygerry
JeffT
You are hereby invited to a JC - ahhh, never mind, you're out.
-
12
Canada Branch invests in the future
by Simon Morley inin canada the total long term investments of canadian registered charities is $14.7 billion.
this is only long term investments and does not include cash, inventory, land and buildings etc.
keep in mind the information is volunteered by the charity and not verified by the canada revenue agency.
-
-
berrygerry
Fundraising without an identifiable use or need for the proceeds 63. Registered charities can only raise funds that are necessary to fulfill their mandates. Fundraising activities should not be undertaken simply because the charity has the opportunity to raise additional funds. There must be an identified use or need for the money. Depending on a charity’s particular circumstances, an identified use or need could include funds required for current and ongoing charitable (and other acceptable) activities or funds to be maintained as reserves. However, when a charity has sufficient income for its identified uses or needs, the need for new fundraising may be questionable
CRA should maybe take a peek at the cashgrab.
-
12
my story slowly
by venting ini remember studying the truth book.
the blood issue never sat well with me.
in fact it's my biggest complant.
-
-
berrygerry
Sorry about your stroke.
I always had high b/p, and always feared heart attack or stroke.
Although I take pills, after being punted out, my b/p is the lowest it's been in 25 years.
Good health to you.
-
15
Elder lying in court!
by Batman89 inpart 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpp0zdmpc-w. part 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qobxt9czxzi.
.
-
-
berrygerry
I remember explaining as the Accounts Servant to the PO certain things that we, as a charity, needed to follow.
He grumbled "Those are just men's rules!"
-
31
If You Owned This Site Would It Be Any Different?
by minimus inthis site is probably one of the most informative jw sites on the internet.
if you want to keep abreast of the watchtower, this is a great place to find out the latest in jw land.
kudos to simon for keeping it going all these years!!!
-
-
berrygerry
Just update it to v-bulletin
-
31
My Elderette is attempting to change the subject again
by Faithful Witness inwe were in the middle of discussing their use of god's personal name, and miss k was not able to find one place in the bible, where jesus actually said the name out loud (that wasn't a quote from the ot).
we had started out by talking about jesus being "the way, the truth and the life.
" then she stated that one of the purposes of jesus' coming to earth, was "to make god's name known.
-
-
berrygerry
One question I would like answered, as a parent, " How bad were your children when you decided to stop loving them?"
"How bad were they, then, that you decided that they should be executed?"