OneEyedJoe

Joined

• started 34 topics
• posted 2,930 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by OneEyedJoe

• 
  86

  Sam's watch

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i just started to watch the february broadcast when i noticed a metallic rattle over the drone of sam's voice.

  (does that man speak with a mouth full of chowin' tobacco or is he choking on the rubbish he reads off the autocue?).

  yep it's his rolex.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Regardless of whether it's a rolex or a knock-off or some other big brand's version of a rolex,  weren't we always told as JWs that appearances matter?  You can't be alone with someone your dating, not because you'll definitely have sex, but because it might look like you could've had sex.  You don't wear flashy clothes to the KH even if they're cheap imitations because it looks like you're making a "showy display."  It doesn't matter what it really is, or how he got it.  What matters is that he's a televangelist wearing a gold watch that looks exactly like a $20k rolex, along with 2 gold rings.  

  I don't care if that watch came out of a box of cracker-jacks, his wearing it for a public appearance on the web is absolutely the height of hypocrisy.
• 
  12

  What really is the overall objective?

  by My Name is of No Consequence in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  one cant help but notice all of the dramatic changes thathave been happening to the organization.

  this is not the religion that i grewup in.

  im not saying that the religion that i grew up in was better, justdifferent.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Yeah, it's all a bit much.  I think they're just changing things just for the sake of change.  It's like they're trying to emulate the hit TV shows these days - always a new plot twist, and the protagonist's goal is always just out of reach.  
• 
  18

  Using the tv.jw.org as a wake up tool with my kids

  by konceptual99 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so, i have been badgered recently to do some kind of family study by my wife.

  thanks to tv.jw.org i now have a really easy tool to use that not only passes this time but actually makes them question the organisation.. our sessions skipping through the delights of the monthly broadcast have been very interesting.

  derision at the wooden delivery of the gb.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  What a loving provision it is for these men to wear many rings.  Just like god allowed isrealites of little means to offer a dove as a sacrifice, so too does the GB allow us to kiss their rings instead of their asses.
• 
  13

  Thank you...

  by Garrett in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  some of you may have seen my previous post regarding my concerns with leaving the organization.. so many of you responded and were so kind and helpful, that is was rather overwhelming.

  i didn't expect so many responses.

  a lot of you also provided links to research as well as some books to read.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Congrats on your new freedom and good luck with the beginning of the rest of your life!
• 
  23

  No such thing as history

  by woodforde in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  why do you think it is that wts limit accessibility to watchtowers and awakes to only issues since year 2000 on jworg?

  a whiff of something slightly orwellian?

  not a case of re-writing history but nixing it altogether?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Wow, that is sneaky.  And a strategy that they continue to employ.  Look no further than the reasoning book's entry on false prophets - which excludes the scripture that clearly indicates that anyone predicting something in god's name that doesn't happen is a false prophet, even though an adjacent scripture is mentioned.  Also, when you search for a scripture on the app or website, it sorts by frequency of use in the publications.  So the embarrassing scriptures that they don't refer to fall to the bottom of a long search results page.
• 
  58

  Musical video on JW-TV February monthly program - must see !!

  by Viva la Vida in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  you must see the musical video at the end of this month program (aprox.

  at 1:04:30).... i don't like to use "must" but this is wow... if you think they couldn't get any lower... just be prepared...

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  well i just watched it just so I could compare with cappytan's version.  I really have no words.  

  Ugh and Herd afterwards - he really could use a personality transplant.  It must take him a lot of concentration to read the teleprompter and not go off on misogynist rants.
• 
  13

  South Texas Introduction

  by artsteel in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  wow, amazing to read all these experiences.. luckily, i walked away from them 20 some odd years ago because i wasn't making it financially and decided to pursue higher education.

  best decision i ever made.

  i was able to finish my degrees and i still shake my head at how these people really believe, really mind boggling.. most family members and friends i knew stopped talking to me, and up to this day i'm glad they did.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Welcome to the forum.  It's always great to hear of another one that got away!
• 
  23

  No such thing as history

  by woodforde in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  why do you think it is that wts limit accessibility to watchtowers and awakes to only issues since year 2000 on jworg?

  a whiff of something slightly orwellian?

  not a case of re-writing history but nixing it altogether?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Well there's that, plus wasn't it in the 60's Awakes that women's brains are smaller than men's thus they are less intelligent, or something like that?
  

  I guess you're right.  I'm probably allowing the way the quote affected me personally to impact my judgement of it's significance.  If I'd been confronted with the blatant misogyny of the older literature as a loyal JW, I would've just dismissed it as having been influenced by popular views of the time.  For others, though, it would've probably had a much larger effect.

  I do wonder why they bothered to include the older WTs.  Some of those have some pretty damning stuff in them too.  
• 
  23

  No such thing as history

  by woodforde in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  why do you think it is that wts limit accessibility to watchtowers and awakes to only issues since year 2000 on jworg?

  a whiff of something slightly orwellian?

  not a case of re-writing history but nixing it altogether?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  I sometimes think that the reason for the differing cut-offs on WTs and Awakes on WT-library (1950 for WTs and 1970 for Awakes) is the infamous 1969 Awake quote that says something about young ones never growing old in this system, encouraging them to neglect schooling, etc.  

  They've got a pretty perfect system set up that makes it easy for them to throw away the old literature anyways.  All the literature is just the same regurgitated crap year after year, so if you go back 50 years you won't really have anything more (other than doctrinal flip-flops) than you would be able to get by just going back 10 years.  

  I'm interested to see if they start removing old stuff from the website too eventually.  Now that would be telling.
• 
  51

  EXPERTS ONLY! A Pop Quiz on (current) Watchtower teaching

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  pop quiz on jw (current) teaching.

  1. was jesus 2nd coming in 1914?.

  2. is jesus 2nd (parousia) presence the same thing as his coming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  screw it, I'll take a go.

  1. No, that was the beginning of his presence.  He's magic, he can be somewhere without actually going there.

  2. No, see above.

  3. Whichever is most convenient at the time.  I think it's been called a parable most recently, but they still treat it as a prophecy, so you choose.

  4. Nope.  Jesus is present, but hasn't come.  Once he comes he'll do the appointing.

  5. I think that's still 1914.

  6. Yet to come

  7. Nope, they just get the fringe benefits of hanging out with the uber special anointed ones.

  8. You shouldn't!  don't you know that reading the bible is how you become an apostate!

  9. No clear stance that I'm aware of after the recent FDS changes, so by default he must still have been (that's a fun conjugation) anointed since they haven't spelled it out.  

  
  

  How'd I do?  Am I wasting enough of my life to have passed the quiz?