at least i have this forum.
is there a shorthand for referring to this website?
saying jehovahs-witness.com seems like a long winded way..
I wonder if people that have eyes open during the prayer are wise to TTATT?
I think it's more likely that they just don't buy into it. The ones in my congregation that keep their heads up during prayer are all 16-20 years old. In quite sure they don't know ttatt, but they must be somewhat aware of how stupid it all is.
at least i have this forum.
is there a shorthand for referring to this website?
saying jehovahs-witness.com seems like a long winded way..
Another way to make the meetings a little easier, since you say you're giving lots of comments, is to look for ways to give comments that are superficially supportive of cult doctrine but will cause any thinkers to have a wtf moment.
For example, a while back in book study there was something about how those who read the Bible with a critical heart object to it. A great comment would be something like "some people object to god ordering the death of all men women and children of other nations, but we know that the only reason they object to this slaughter is that they have a critical heart"
You do need to taper off the commenting, though. Start working to get out of the spotlight.
at least i have this forum.
is there a shorthand for referring to this website?
saying jehovahs-witness.com seems like a long winded way..
Used to be jwn but I guess it'd be jwc now.
I've found posting from the meetings almost make it as bearable as a root canal. Which, of course, represents a significant improvement.
i'm looking for some clever comebacks.
i really don't care that i am an apostate, but would like to deliver a quick comeback or two to perhaps make the other person think.
any suggestions most welcome.
hello all... i currently studying the bible teach book and i'm just curious what information does the study conductor record about the student and is it passed on??
and they keep on saying "the truth" which is starting to get on my nerves.
lol.
Usually they just keep your name, contact details, what publications they've left you and maybe a few personal details (children, hobbies/interests, notable personal problems, etc)
The only reason I can think of for passing it on is if they couldn't do the study anymore, in which case they'll give it to whoever takes over.
Do you mind if I ask what lead to your accepting a study? Do you have other jw family or aquaintences?
If you're interested, the site jwfacts.com has lots of information on jws, and what they currently teach, as well as what they've taught in the past. As a currently active jw, I found that website quite eye-opening and to be completely accurate.
i was sitting at the meeting the other night and for the first time it hit, jw talks or magazines are never uplifting!
i rarely, if ever hear a talk or read a magazines and have it give nothing but praise to jehovahs servants or just praise jehovah and jesus throughout it.
they never just a read through the bible or just a bible story explained or told.
Yeah, they definitely speak out of both sides of their mouth. But when you compare the frequency of their words, you get what they're really saying. Like in another thread I commented on the fact that they definitely have articles about not judging others, etc, etc. The problem is that every other week theres an article about bad association and how do you determine bad association? Well you have to make a judgement...
They pay lip service to up building things, but it's overwhelmed by the sheer volume of the beat-down guilt-trip.
if you, like me, have noticed the sudden increase in hysteria in the khs right now, i put it down to that jw tv site.
its's far more extensive than i thought it was, i thought it was just 1, 1 hour program a month.
there's a s*** load of videos on that site.. and the real problem, from just watching a clip from each video, is that these guys are clearly "mentally unstable".
i was sitting at the meeting the other night and for the first time it hit, jw talks or magazines are never uplifting!
i rarely, if ever hear a talk or read a magazines and have it give nothing but praise to jehovahs servants or just praise jehovah and jesus throughout it.
they never just a read through the bible or just a bible story explained or told.
i was sitting at the meeting the other night and for the first time it hit, jw talks or magazines are never uplifting!
i rarely, if ever hear a talk or read a magazines and have it give nothing but praise to jehovahs servants or just praise jehovah and jesus throughout it.
they never just a read through the bible or just a bible story explained or told.
They had a perfect opportunity to up build during the Zone (zoned out) meeting. They had over 1 million people listening and the final talk was on tight pants, 23 yr. old MS's, and Spanx? With all the problems everyone is facing, this is what they choose to discuss?
I brought this up when my in-laws were talking about the zone visit. I've been pretty open about my stance that AMIII was making pharisiacal rules and going beyond the things written. My father-in-law's only rebuttal was that "we were getting a window into what it's like a bethel - it's a whole different world and they have to set higher standards so that the world can't pick out any flaws." Even when I emphasize that they had an unprecedented opportunity to build up 1 million JWs all at once, and they squandered it he sticks to this. Basically it was a privilege for us to get to see more of them and they shouldn't have to change anything for us.
i was sitting at the meeting the other night and for the first time it hit, jw talks or magazines are never uplifting!
i rarely, if ever hear a talk or read a magazines and have it give nothing but praise to jehovahs servants or just praise jehovah and jesus throughout it.
they never just a read through the bible or just a bible story explained or told.
Perpetually guilty people are easier to manipulate. If someone's beaten down enough they lose the self-confidence to question or to act in their own interests at the expense of leadership.
Haha, you know, that actually crossed my mind 2 Sunday's ago during the blood Watchtower. In my mind I could not figure out how we ended up on the blood topic with how the Watchtower started. Full 360 on what started.
Yeah, I was quite perplexed myself. The title was something about being holy, and to read the article you'd think that the majority of what it takes to be holy is rejecting a blood transfusion.
