OneEyedJoe

Joined

• started 34 topics
• posted 2,930 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by OneEyedJoe

• 
  22

  is this still a belief? no 'marraige' after being resurected?

  by sowhatnow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was having a discussion with my sister yesterday, and she said to me,'mom told me that if dad dies at armageddon, she cant get remarried in the new system' .

  i told he i have never heard such a thing, but i do recall that it was believed that anyone who dies now, cannot be married in the 'new world' because they are to be as angels in heaven.. she said , so why be resurrected if yiu cant live your dream of having a loving mate and perfect children?

  god is still dictating to you how you will live.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Wow joe, they finally corrected that teaching? Took long enough!

  Yep...I only paid attention because our CO that gave the talk could barely get through it, having lost his wife (that he clearly loved immensely) about 4 years ago. Afterward I said to my wife "you know, they really could've saved a lot of people a huge amount of heartache if only they weren't so dogmatic about that." Her response was "oh...I guess that [the no marriage for resurrected ones doctrine] never really mattered to me." ugh.
• 
  22

  is this still a belief? no 'marraige' after being resurected?

  by sowhatnow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i was having a discussion with my sister yesterday, and she said to me,'mom told me that if dad dies at armageddon, she cant get remarried in the new system' .

  i told he i have never heard such a thing, but i do recall that it was believed that anyone who dies now, cannot be married in the 'new world' because they are to be as angels in heaven.. she said , so why be resurrected if yiu cant live your dream of having a loving mate and perfect children?

  god is still dictating to you how you will live.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  That was, as far as I know, never a belief regarding living forever on the earth and only for the anointed.
  

  No, this always applied to people who had the earthly hope, until a QFR article last year. They also covered it in the last talk of the assembly last year - that now this was apparently only talking about people in heaven, and we can't say for sure what people on earth will be allowed.
• 
  16

  LOL -

  by Bloody Hotdogs! in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  tee hee hee.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Wow. That could not be a more honest look for a GB member - wolf in sheep's clothing.

  What is going in here?
• 
  17

  "They 'thought' themselves out of the truth, and clearly they are living an unhappy life now!"

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  yep, these gems and comments were used in the talk today:.

  speaking of ones who "failed to show appreciation for all the rich spiritual food we get from the f&ds", the speaker said this:.

  "many have even failed to keep up with everything we are lovingly provided by christ's brothers, and rather than keeping their faith strong, they have become complacent and even critical ofjehovah's provisions!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  And the main reason that ex-JWS are miserable (those who are) is because of the loss of their family!

  This is the point the consistently forget. It's like saying, don't eat red meat, because if you do, I'll cut off your tongue. This is a protection for you, because everyone that's disobeyed me and ate red meat lost their ability to speak!

  F*** this cult.
• 
  9

  Edit the title of thread or delete

  by paulmolark in

  1. forum
  2. suggestions

  is there anyway to perform either of the two options listed above.

  i created a post with a title that is confusing and would like to correct it.

  is this possible for myself or an admin to perform?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Wait, so that thread about child cannibalism that I've been avoiding was supposed to be about something else?
• 
  25

  Dangerous "Pent up" feelings inside of most witnesses?

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i have often wondered if there is more harm done to people who are stifled or smothered from expressing their natural conduct, feelings or actions because of it being condemned by religious ideals?.

  so if a person keeps suppressing their real personality and tries to mould themselves to the "perfect" or "ideal" version as expected from those controlling them, could they eventually "bust" so to speak?.

  for instance, witnesses condemn many forms of entertainment.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Based on the rampant claims of things like chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalga, lower back problems, hives, chronic pain, etc, etc. I think there's got to be something tremendously unhealthy about the lifestyle. There seems to be a disproportionately great number of psychologically influenced conditions among JWs. At least in my area, but it seems that this isn't limited to one place based on what I've read on the forum.

  Adding in things like excessive drinking, overeating, etc that people also do when dealing with mental stress and you start to see why so many JWs have things like gout, diabetes, and heart problems too. All likely caused by either the "can never do enough" lifestyle or repressing inner thoughts/doubts.
• 
  10

  "I just don't like being lied to"

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so i dropped this comment to someone from "my" congregation...... "i just don't like being lied to".... this was in response to their attempt to become my 'bff' (i'm sarcastically using the expression 'best friends forever' here).

  i ran into them in the street.

  they started chatting all about the cong gossip, teachings, upcoming witness events etc.... i was just quiet and not really contributing to the conversation.. when she asked "so what's new with you?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Such a good line. I've used that with my wife (though that's gone a bit differently haha). It's great because it's expressing a feeling that no one can argue with and only indirectly makes an accusation. I'm sure you'll get some more conversations with your new BFFs though!
• 
  32

  WHAT IS YOUR "AFTER MEETING RITUAL? "

  by brandnew in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  me ?

  my after meeting ritual, is getting my suit off, and a beer in my hand....in less than 2 minutes from entering my door.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  porn and a wank to get that brainwashing out of my head...
  

  I've heard it called a lot of things, but brainwashing is a new one.
• 
  19

  The multitude that no man can number

  by SonoftheTrinity in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  how can protection from destruction at armageddon be solely with the jehovah's witnesses when the great multitude is one that no man could number while the jehovah's witnesses put great effort into cooking statistics of how many jws there are worldwide?

  the unscriptural scare tactics they use are blatantly insulting to anyone who can read a bible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Haha, yeah I think I wondered that myself at some point. I justified it by including in the "great crowd" the unrighteous that would be resurrected, but I'm not sure if that has any basis in the bible or JW doctrine.
• 
  32

  WHAT IS YOUR "AFTER MEETING RITUAL? "

  by brandnew in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  me ?

  my after meeting ritual, is getting my suit off, and a beer in my hand....in less than 2 minutes from entering my door.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Hopefully, my after-meeting ritual is a thing of the past...but most of the time it was get undressed and get 3 fingers of scotch in a glass.