They have been (indirectly) fudging the numbers for a while now:
- The 15-minute per month publisher.
- The pressure put on the R/F to report time almost certainly leads to many inactive ones being counted as publishers.
- The pressure on elders by the CO when a new irregular/inactive person shows up on file causes them to apply the pressure on publishers, and in some cases (reported here) even report time on behalf of the inactive one.
- The recent transition to counting tracts as placements
- Counting time spent on a quick-build, etc.
- Counting time spent in family study
- Counting time spent giving (and sometimes preparing, depending on the elder) public talks.
- Counting time spent writing letters to leave at not-at-homes only to eventually throw them away.
Their numbers are essentially meaningless for any purpose other than comparison year over year. Luckily they make changes in how they cheat the numbers slowly enough that they're still useful to some extent.