@ crofty your right, a bit off topic. Posted it to give an example of how scientific data is sometimes manipulated to push an agenda.
@ njw no political affiliations here.
to start off with let me clarify that by asshole atheism i am not referring to strong atheism or any other type of upfront atheism.
what i am referring to is the belligerent, hateful atheism that smacks of trolls and other types who want to derail conversation or comments at any cost..
i enjoy hearing comments from both sides of the subjects of theism, nationalism or politics, especially from those who have intense opinions.
@ crofty your right, a bit off topic. Posted it to give an example of how scientific data is sometimes manipulated to push an agenda.
@ njw no political affiliations here.
to start off with let me clarify that by asshole atheism i am not referring to strong atheism or any other type of upfront atheism.
what i am referring to is the belligerent, hateful atheism that smacks of trolls and other types who want to derail conversation or comments at any cost..
i enjoy hearing comments from both sides of the subjects of theism, nationalism or politics, especially from those who have intense opinions.
An interesting take on the "science" of climate change.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ew05sRDAcU
i noticed that in paragraph 13 they mention the girl sheryl that i believe was the same girl that was in their video about the typhoon that hit the philippines back in 2013. they talk as if she's so happy and thankful to jehovah even mention that she lost most of her family in that typhoon.
what they don't mention was her family members that were killed in that typhoon were inside a kh thinking they were going to be protected by jehovah since they were in gods house and his people and all.
they also fail to mention that the government authorities were telling people to get out of town but the elders were most likely telling the people in their congregations to stick around and just come to the hall.
cancer healingusing emotions (watch this video):.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmmnlmn1dpc&sns=em.
been away from the site for a few days...because i have been busy getting these!!!!!!
(pixel, thank you!
) they did not make it easy, plus technical difficulties.. for the main attraction:.
Here is a great little FREE video down-loader I use all the time.
http://www.freemake.com/free_video_downloader/
Have these disappearing videos on your own hard-drive for future reference.
i watched a documentary last night where they found old bones and spear heads in mexico.
this work was originally started in the 60s but they went back over the decades.
the main researcher dated the items at about 20,000 years old.
The history of the Hueyatlaco archaeological site has been controversial from the very beginning. This in fact is what makes it so interesting. Renown scientist from many fields have been on both sides of this issue since the 1960s. The debate may be unwarranted or not (depending on your views) but the documentary draws attention to the debate which is an established event in modern history. Much of what is in the documentary can be found on Wikipedia but in the documentary you actually get to see interviews with some of the people involved with the events. This in itself gives this documentary some merit. Is it being spun to some degree or is the story told with some bias? No doubt. But then we are all adults and can come to our own conclusions.
i watched a documentary last night where they found old bones and spear heads in mexico.
this work was originally started in the 60s but they went back over the decades.
the main researcher dated the items at about 20,000 years old.
i watched a documentary last night where they found old bones and spear heads in mexico.
this work was originally started in the 60s but they went back over the decades.
the main researcher dated the items at about 20,000 years old.
Science in general does seek knowledge and rewards those who discover it. However many corporations, and institutions hold the financial reigns of science and scientist. This can be and sometimes is to the detriment of progress in a given direction. Much of science is driven by the military or powerful corporations with those agendas satisfied first and foremost then the public receives benefits in a trickle down manner. Profits almost always supersede benefits.
Don't get me wrong, I love science, it is just that to think it can't also be tampered with by those with power is being naive. Ultimately truth wins out but sometimes it can take decades or more. The above documentary is some proof of that IMHO. I prefer to examine the message on not the messenger. To condemn the information on the basis of an ad hominem attack of the writers/directors could allow one to miss some very interesting facts.
i watched a documentary last night where they found old bones and spear heads in mexico.
this work was originally started in the 60s but they went back over the decades.
the main researcher dated the items at about 20,000 years old.
I have watch this video several times and find it very interesting. The problem with dating methods is the wide margin between minimum and maximum ages. The use of diatom dating to me seems to be the most sensible and gives a minimum date of 80k for this site. The date of 400k is a maximum date derived from the dating method that measures daughter properties of uranium decay involving hydrogen atoms.
It shouldn't surprise us that information and even facts can be suppressed by powerful institutions for their own agendas, protecting their "status quo" so to speak. After all, haven't most of us have experienced that to some degree in our own lives?
As far as the Brahmic Veda connection, at least it was no where mention in the film and I doubt that can be tied to any of the original archaeologist at the site as a motive for their work. One thing for sure is that this site has been shut down by powerful entities who are not concerned about the story these artifacts tell.
Even at original dates of 20k for the artifacts (60's scientific technology) flies in the face of mankind being only 6k old.
i stumbled across a scripture today.
it's numbers 13:33 "and there we saw the nephilim, the sons of anak, who are from the nephilim, and in comparison we seemed like grasshoppers, both to us and to them.. now if they honestly believed that they saw the nephilim, it would mean that some nephilim would have had to survive the flood or that the hijinks of the fallen angels before the flood, happened again shortly thereafter.
the only other thing i can come up with is that nephilim was some kind of generic word that implied giant proportions, but not necessarily the nephilim.. comments from the more educated appreciated.. silent.
Nephilim, Anakim or giants still exist.
http://izismile.com/2009/05/11/giant_women_13_pic.html
Why did the Israelites run?