who wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
any would-be electoral fraudster could have worked out how to smooth out a graph - how would they do that? I mean, the graph apparently shows the amount of votes coming in over time.
BTW good point about asking for a reference for the graph - Sargon should've made a link or reference available.
dick morris sounds the alert:.
https://www.dickmorris.com/fight-massive-democratice-fraud/ .
You can't assume the winner cheated just because they won - I don't think anyone's doing this; I know I'm certainly not. However, irregularities certainly need looking into.
Lastly, check your own bias - yes, yes, everyone has some kind of bias or another. I think we're all on the same page on this particular point, kinda goes without saying, TBH.
Want to call the election a fraud and a full recount whoever wins? - I'm not saying this. I'm just posting evidence for irregularities. Apparently, Trump is calling in a bolus of lawyers to look into this issue. I don't know where the situation goes from here.
Have you seen the first 8mins of the link I posted? What do you make of it?
who wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
is there any actual evidence to back it up? - look at the first 8 mins of this video.
Approx. 150,000 votes come in for Biden at 4 am, none for Trump, in the state of Michigan. Bit dodgy ...
dick morris sounds the alert:.
https://www.dickmorris.com/fight-massive-democratice-fraud/ .
There certainly seems to be irregularities.
Take a look at this video, particularly the first ten minutes of it.
150,000 votes come in for Biden at 4 am, none for Trump. This was in Michigan, I think.
Anyhoo, here's the vid ...
maybe the borg was right all the time.
maybe armageddon is just an unassailable tide of boredom and november ennui (good word that).. i did a typo, nobember and nearly left it in.
or knobember.
Many over 65s are a hell of a long way from being in a nursing home. I certainly am! - then it should be up to you to follow advice and take precautions.
FFS, it ain't rocket science ...
maybe the borg was right all the time.
maybe armageddon is just an unassailable tide of boredom and november ennui (good word that).. i did a typo, nobember and nearly left it in.
or knobember.
The new lockdown is madness, utter madness.
I can accept the first lockdown because we didn't know what we were dealing with in March.
But now, we've learnt more about COVID.
The virus is lethal to elderly people, obese people, diabetic people and others with underlying health issues (e.g. HIV+ people, perhaps).
It's not lethal to the rest of us.
The COVID pandemic is a fairly nuanced situation, one that needs a nuanced solution.
A national lockdown to combat COVID is the equivalent of a surgeon performing delicate micro-surgery using a 14lb lump hammer.
Plus, the virus will still be out there, waiting for us after the lockdown.
A better way would be to shield the elderly and vulnerable groups and let the rest of us get on with life.
Boris Johnson is no latter-day Churchill. He probably won't even be remembered for 'getting brexit done' - he'll be remembered as the Prime Minister who totally wrecked the British economy. Shame on him.
who wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
I think Trump will probably win.
Most of the 'liberal' media want him to lose, with different polls saying how bad he's gonna do.
I take this to mean that Trump will get himself four more years.
There is a spike in cases because COVID has evolved to be transmitted between organisms and hijack host cells.
Anony Mous got it right - there is a spike in cases, but not in deaths.
Basically, COVID is lethal to elderly people and people with underlying health issues. It's not very lethal to everyone else.
So, only the vulnerable should be shielded or self-isolate. Everyone else should be getting on with life as normal.
Tribalistic and Racist tendencies may well be innate. Racist thought that takes root and brings forth action is taught - but surely racist thought that takes root is innate?
I think you and me have each got it half-right.
There are aspects of racism that are innate; other aspects are taught.
when i see polls suggesting trump has a 95% chance to lose the presidency, according to drudge report, which is now totally liberal, and i see the huge crowds of trump supporters as opposed to the 20 people showing up for biden rallies, i have to wonder what i should believe.
do i believe my lying eyes or am i totally messed up?.
Ok ,I took what Simon said on his post about the pollsters claiming 96% voted for Hillary Clinton .And she did get the popular vote didn`t she ? - she got more votes, but not 96% of the votes.
