“Finkelstein”: “The JWS intermingling with the old Hebraic law of abstaining from blood, goes onto the ridiculous on many levels.”
“cofty”: “The onus is 100% on JWs and JW sympathisers to show beyond all doubt that allowing a child to die rather than permit a blood transfusion is clearly demanded in scripture.. . . At the very least any honest person would have to admit there may be more to the question of blood than they had previously thought. Resorting to ridiculous excuses like saying the verse was talking about "inadvertently" eating a dead animal, and approving of risking a child's life on that basis, is shameful.”
Both those observations are most succinct and absolutely right on the money! Definitely, and emphatically, two thumbs up for each! Captain Obvious of those Hotels-dot-com commercials couldn’t have put it any clearer.