About the alleged "pornography ring"...
What the judical system allows for, in real terms, is the production, collection and storage of child sex abuse material.
You can call it documentation of judical proceedings if you like, but the reality of it is that it is a process undertaken by men that do not have the legal authority to generate material dealing with child sex abuse.
The stories (testimony) that a child gives to an adult man about being raped are vulnerable to being used as child sex abuse material.
Not only that, but the judical process allows for the rapist to have an audience for those stories to be told. He gets to fulfill his sexual fantasies with an audience...usually with the child he raped actually giving the account. This process feeds into the rapist's and the elders' voyeuristic need for exposure to "forbidden sex" stories.
When I listened to the RC in Australia, I was puzzled by the number of times that BCH asked for reinstatement and then did not get reinstated because he wasn't repentant. If BCH genuinely wanted to be reinstated, he would have faked repentance. The reinstatement wasn't the issue that BCH wanted to discuss - he wanted to hear all about those sex stories that the elders were going to discuss with him. BCH was getting off on the judical process.
The whole judical process handling child rape is a pornography setup. The testimony that the elders collect, document and store falls under the umbrella of child sex abuse material. Just because it isn't being distributed publicly doesn't mean that it doesn't serve the same purpose - those child sex stories are vulnerable to being used for the purpose of pornographic stimulation. Pornography does not have to be an image for it to be classified as pornography - the "testimony" that the elders diligently pursue, and keep so secret, is pornographic in nature.
It should be illegal for the elders to be involved in the investigation of any child sex abuse allegation. The potential for abuse of the system is huge. Huge. Just think of the amount of written material that has been produced by unqualified elders that concerns sex acts with minors.
Why is the WTS allowed to produce, collect and store the stories of sex with minors? Nobody else is allowed to do that unless they are professionals. Anyone else doing that would have their asses thrown in jail and the key thrown away. Tell me where else an adult man (a window washer) gets to interview children about their experiences in having sex with an adult. And gets to write it down, and gets to discuss it with other men, and then....gets to see and hear that child give details in the same room as the man who raped them.
The judical system of the JWs is perversion at its finest. In any other setting, what is done in the JW judical process would absolutely be called the production of pornographic material.