Oh my...what can possibly go wrong...
It is just so Catholic. Monks and young boys
they offered themselves willingly—in new yorkricky, a construction project manager in hawaii, was invited to serve as a commuter bethelite to assist with the warwick project.
his wife, kendra, wanted him to accept the invitation.
however, they had a legitimate concern: the welfare of their 11-year-old son, jacob.
Oh my...what can possibly go wrong...
It is just so Catholic. Monks and young boys
the issue of whether or not the elders have a duty to report is clear cut in canada.
this will make it impossible for the wts to wriggle out of the wrongs that have been exposed in quebec recently.
the elders in those situations have received their instructions from the wts lawyers and they have been advised wrongly.. for several years (can't remember when this was made law...years back), it has been mandatory for everyone in canada to report suspected cases of child abuse, which, naturally, include the sexual abuse of minors.
The issue of whether or not the elders have a duty to report is clear cut in Canada. This will make it impossible for the WTS to wriggle out of the wrongs that have been exposed in Quebec recently. The elders in those situations have received their instructions from the WTS lawyers and they have been advised wrongly.
For several years (can't remember when this was made law...years back), it has been mandatory for everyone in Canada to report suspected cases of child abuse, which, naturally, include the sexual abuse of minors. A person doesn't have to know for sure if a child is being sexually abused...they just have to suspect and they have a "duty to report".
From the FAQs page of Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal:
Do I need to report child abuse and neglect?
Yes. Everyone has a duty to report child abuse and neglect under Canadian child welfare laws. Professionals who work with children and youth have an added responsibility to report.
You are obliged to report child maltreatment if you know or suspect it is occurring. This is called the 'duty to report'. Every person in Canada has the duty to report known or suspected child maltreatment by law.
And who does a person report to?
Who do I call if I suspect child abuse or neglect?
Known or suspected abuse or neglect of a child must be reported to:
local child welfare services (e.g., children’s aid society or child and family services agency), or
provincial/territorial social service ministries or departments, or
local police
You will note that the Watchtower Legal Department is not included in that list as to "who to call".
For all Canadian elders who received legal advice from the WTS, I think you have received really bad advice. And, that includes each and every person who knew about, or even suspected, child abuse happening in the congregation. The mandatory reporting laws include everybody - you, me...every single Canadian. The parents of that child, the neighbors, the ones in the congregation that suspected the abuse was occurring...all of them.
People think they are exempt from reporting if they aren't acting in a professional capacity. In Canada, you are not exempt.
I myself have reported to the authorities, on more than one occasion, suspected child abuse. I make no apologies for doing so and, sometimes, it has involved family and friends. How else would I know about it except that I was close to the situation? Yes...I was the one who called...if anyone needs to know.
Why? Because I know my legal responsibility. Not just my moral responsibility - my legal responsibility is to report to authorities when I see or suspect a minor is being harmed. And I do that. And not just when my job has required it - I do it in my personal and social life.
The JWs do not take legal and social responsibility and in Canada, the law is clear on mandatory reporting. Very clear.
hi orphancrow.
thought you might be interested in the following, brief, court case summary.
high court family division - 18 november 2016an nhs foundation hospital v mr and mrs t. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/ewhc/fam/2016/2980.html.
I am still thinking about this....more thoughts
You will notice what it is that the parents are pleading for in this case. They already know that they cannot oppose a blood transfusion for their child:
"They are understandably unable to consent to what is being proposed but they do not oppose it and leave the decision to the Court."
So what is all the fuss about taking this to court? a case that they don't "oppose"?
Here we go:
"They emphasise that they would want forms of treatment other than the administration of blood products to be considered..."
And there we have it - the reason why the WTS continues to oppose the law on the matter of child sacrifice - to promote their alternative brand of medicine.
One more thought.
This concerns the Society's position in Australia that a mandatory reporting law for child abuse would fix the problem down there. Sez who? Why would the courts believe that? The WTS' record of respecting the law on minor children is completely the opposite. Laws that have been in place to protect children from having their parents use them for a sacrifice to the Blood God have been challenged over and over again in the courts. Why would we expect anything different with the laws put in place to protect victims of sex abuse when laws protecting the minor victims of their blood doctrine are still being challenged?
what do you think about these things.
it seems like a monumental waste of time and money, a pipe dream of the governing body based on wishful thinking.
this corporation is going down the tubes with these asshole deluded genius's calling the financial investment shot.. buying chemical dump property around the world to build their financial empire headquarters on while facing massive child molestation lawsuits now and many more in the future means it looking kind of bleak for these messed idiots running things.. http://jw-branchoffices.blogspot.com/p/watchtower-remote-translation-offices.html.
Eh, the WTS has probably trained all those translation "experts" by using Harry Cotton's ESL courses as a foundation entry point.
Old Harry Cotton's interests are being looked after well, I would imagine.
hi orphancrow.
thought you might be interested in the following, brief, court case summary.
high court family division - 18 november 2016an nhs foundation hospital v mr and mrs t. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/ewhc/fam/2016/2980.html.
darkspliver: But also, I suppose, it was a strange rant/useage, as this is an example of the 'elders' and 'governing body' very much taking a back seat and letting the court/hospital take the lead, without any drama or f'ing and blinding.
Which is probably the best compromise and the reason why I wanted to flag this up with OrphanCrow.
The parent's made written representations regarding their wishes and did not attend the court, the hospital was happy to follow those wishes, with the priviso that they could adminster a blood transfusion, if needed. The judge agreed. End of case. I thought the brief write-up and comments of the Judge were interesting, which is again why I flagged it up for OrphanCrow.
It isn't that strange or odd if you take into consideration the decades of losing cases that the WT has faced whenever their child sacrifice practice gets challenged. For a bit of background on how the law has been handled in the case of minor children whose parents will let them die for a "god"...this is a good place to start:
http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com/bloode.html
The Watchtower has known since 1944 that child sacrifice will not hold up in court but that hasn't stopped them from continually challenging the Prince ruling:
Where Witness parents wish to refuse blood transfusions for their minor children, American law generally does not permit them to do so if there is no alternative course of acceptable medical treatment. As the US Supreme Court observed in the 1944 case of Prince v. Massachusetts, 72 “Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow that they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can make that choice for themselves.”
Australia has a Blood Transfusion Act that has been in place since 1960 that will allow a minor child to be transfused (details at first link).
In some areas of the world, the legal standards are such that a case like happened in the UK doesn't even get filed - that child gets transfused regardless of whether the parents follow a barbaric religious practice of child sacrifice. And, many many cases go through the courts on a regular basis - they just don't make the news.
What the Watchtower has done - for reasons the reader can discern for themselves - is to ignore the law on minor children and continue to make the adherence to child sacrifice a measurement of adult JWs' spiritual standing.
The secular world has recognized the right of a minor child to have access to life saving measures. The Watchtower does not recognize that the child has rights - they have continually pushed for the right of the family to be a sealed unit. That has been their legal argument from Day One - both with blood and with child sex abuse.
A child, to the WTS, is property. To be used and abused as anyone sees fit. Including up for grabs to be used in the medical industry as tiny little guinea piggies.
As far as the profanity goes...it is only extreme profanity that is a problem here, from what I have been able to discern.
So...fuck the Watchtower Society and fuck all those parents who blindly lay their babies on the altar of the Blood God Jehovah. Fuck them all.
canada : new documentary on pedophilia amongst jehovah's witnesses.
will air on thursday dec. 1, 9h00 pm on radio-canada in french.. http://ici.radio-canada.ca/tele/enquete/2016-2017/.
Yalbmert, have you found the transcripts yet? My French is really bad and I can't find my way around that site very well. I was told that there should be both English and French transcripts for their shows
Yes. Waiting and wanting an English version really really bad! That was a tremendous documentary and it deserves as many views as possible. Emails to Radio Canada will help that process. Jus' sayin'
jehovah's witnesses: internal judicial process 'catastrophic' for members alleging child sex abuse.
radio-canada's enquête investigates allegations that the closed religious movement fails to protect children.
cbc news posted: dec 01, 2016 5:00 am et.
yalbmert: Wow that report was a bombshell!!
Yes!!! One of the best I have ever seen. Those Frenchies sure know their stuff. They put together a compelling and comprehensive expose that is well worth being distributed far and wide.
I have limited French skills but I picked up bit and pieces. And then, of course, so many familiar faces and stories and names came later and in places during the film. People we all know and have seen before.
Well done to each and every person who had a hand in making this production happen - years and years of work behind this documentary. And every tiny bit has been important to get to where we are now
So happy to see this
Hoping to see an English version soon.
Yaaayyyy!!!! Radio Canada - you made a good one!
we have seen that the society falls back on the line "it is the victims right to approach the authorities" during all the abuse claims.. they use this excuse to try and defend the passive lack of action in failing to report suspected cases of abuse.. a comparison came to mind:.
if we came across a person lying in the street who says they were hit by a car, would we say "it is your absolute right to call the paramedics and police"?.
or would we take the initiative and call those authorities ourselves to help the person?.
Stuckinarut: We have seen that the society falls back on the line "It is the victims right to approach the authorities" during all the abuse claims.
They use this excuse to try and defend the passive lack of action in failing to report suspected cases of abuse.
That excuse peed me right off. The WTS claims that they don't report because the process could traumatize the victim. What a lame and pathetic excuse.
The WTS has used children for years and years to take on the court system.
First they started with the flag salute challenge back in the 30s and 40s. Did they care then if the legal system would traumatize those children? No. They didn't give a flying **** if the children would be traumatized by being pulled out of school, beat up, and then be taken to court to make sure the WTS won their court cases. They didn't care that their legal challenge resulted in one boy even getting castrated. They didn't leave it up to those kids to decide to go to court - they let those kids be charged and dragged into court.
Then came the blood transfusion challenges. Does the WTS care about those children being traumatized by the court system? No. Of course not. The WT lawyers and blood police are there in a heartbeat when a child's life is in danger, filing court papers, putting the child through all sorts of legal hoops and processes, regardless of how traumatizing it is to the child facing death. They don't give the kid the choice to take it to court when it is their precious blood ban on the line.
And now...to make the excuse that "it is up to the victim" because "the legal system traumatizes the victim". As though the WTS cares about the victim. They never have and they never will. Their history proves it. It is a pathetic excuse.
canada : new documentary on pedophilia amongst jehovah's witnesses.
will air on thursday dec. 1, 9h00 pm on radio-canada in french.. http://ici.radio-canada.ca/tele/enquete/2016-2017/.
vidiot: ...tougher than we look, and disinclined to tolerate bullshit.
It's because of all the moose up here, Vidiot.
I was told by a hunter that the moose is the one of the most dangerous animals in the bush to hunt. He said that if you don't know how to track them, that the moose will double back on you, come up behind you, and kill you. Trample you to death and leave your bones for the coyotes and wolves to pick over.
Canadians know how to hunt moose. We know to watch our backs when hunting the beast of the bush
:)
jehovah's witnesses: internal judicial process 'catastrophic' for members alleging child sex abuse.
radio-canada's enquête investigates allegations that the closed religious movement fails to protect children.
cbc news posted: dec 01, 2016 5:00 am et.
I know someone who knows someone...you know...that kind of thing
Anyways, if Radio-Canada receives enough interest and requests, they will likely run an English version. Let them know that you want to hear it in English, and they will gladly air another edition. Just because they are French down there doesn't mean they can't or won't speak English!
There will be both English and French transcripts available on Radio-Canada's website.
And, I wouldn't be surprised if the dubbing is or has happened. Lots of time before it airs. Easy to dub. Just a little bit of overtime for the CBC Radio-Canada crew and super support from our one and only Peter Mansbridge.
So, if you have a few free minutes, send Radio-Canada a quick note and ask for the program to be re-aired in English. It would probably happen if there are enough requests