Lee: This topic just doesn't seem to get anywhere near the attention you'd think it would.
This topic has been going on for so long that it isn't "news" anymore. Just another kid(s) not getting blood when they need it.
The first court case involving a JW child being denied blood happened in 1951. The number of court cases involving JW children since that time is astronomical - it has never stopped.
There are pages and pages of court cases, involving children and blood, listed on this site: https://jwdivorces.bravehost.com/
And a good article concerning children and blood refusal: https://adc.bmj.com/content/90/7/715#ref-13
It is sad that this ruling, in Prince vs Massachusetts 1944, hasn't been held as a standard by the WTS:
“Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow that they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children...”
The WTS/org has always just ignored that ruling. They don't care. They don't care about children - they advocate child sacrifice. Barbaric.
I noticed that this article concerns Africa. And sickle cell disease. Africa, where the org is claiming "growth", has a high incidence of sickle cell disease. It is horrifying to think of how many more articles we are going to read about children needing a blood transfusion to alleviate their excruciating pain and the JW parents refusing. This isn't the same as a person maybe requiring blood during a surgical procedure - these children will suffer unbearably without blood - daily. Until they die. In pain. Horrible pain.
Whenever I hear of yet another child not getting a blood transfusion when they need it, I always think of this image - from that old Paradise book