The JW team did little to inspire trust or respect in the face of the ARC commission, overall.
The sad thing is that brought out into the "broad daylight" and being brought into scrutiny - the JW team appeared out of their usual habitat, where they never have to answer questions or be accountable etc.
They handled the questions and the whole process as they would answer a "readers question" - always framed within the JW thought process.
They were asked honest questions - the JW team did not give a "good witness".
They even failed to appear as simply "dellusional and yet pious" - they came across as something else.
I don't believe there would have been any non-witness in that court room who would have been moved to listen with true respect, to have had their "eyes opened' to the deep christian integrity of the JW organisation.
The JW team, overall, displayed something uncomfortably deceptive...