Frenchy,
I am glad that you decided to repsond to this important issue. Let me first reassure you that my response was not hostile, although it was most definitely emotional. You are certainly not alone in voicing that opinion and it is certainly not the first time that I have heard it expressed.
You have focued your response on why God allows evil (such as rape) to occur and whether, in a general sense, God has a reason for choosing not to interfere with human actions (although presumably he could). As you acknowledged, it is not the same to say that God chooses not to interfere and saying that he causes that which he does not choose to prevent. My belief is that God never chooses to prevent humans from committing crimes and is therefore in no way responsible for individual crimes that are committed. One could argue that he allows ALL evil for some higher purpose. That, however, does not imply that God is making some individual judgment every time evil is committed.
The statement that you have chosen to ignore in your response is the statement you made that I find repulsive and revolting.
I’m not saying that God punished you, no, never. But he allows terrible things to happen to us when he could prevent it. Why? Like I said before, I don’t really know but perhaps it’s because he has to, not as a lesson to angels as is suggested by the WTS, but as things needed for our personal development.
It is quite another matter to say that God chooses not to prevent a horrible crime that is about to happen to someone because that person is in need of some personal development that will be served by this crime. If God is actually making a conscious decision for that purpose, then one might argue that God is indeed at least partly responsible for the crime, insofar as he allows this crime whereas He might choose to prevent another one about to happen to someone else. I cannot reconcile such a concept with the concept of a loving God.
What possible personal development would you have us believe that Seven and Waiting could have needed, so that a loving God might have decided that they needed to be raped to serve their necessary personal development? What about little children that are abused or even murdered? What personal development might they be in need of? I find the very question absurd.
To make one of your illustrations relevant to what I find so repulsive, let's use the Father and Son and on the train tracks. This time let's not use any misdirection to cloud the issue since this post is a response to one individual act of rape, not two simultaneous ones. There is only the Son playing on the train tracks, unaware of the train coming. The Father sees the situation and has plenty of time to act. He chooses not to act because his son is need of some personal development that will be served by allowing him to be run over by the train, or perhaps raped by a stranger, to make it even more relevant. Now what do you think of the Father? What personal development deserved to be taught through his son's death or rape? Most societies would consider the Father criminally negligent in either case. Would you have us believe that a loving God is any less responsible for his actions or inactions?
The only way that I personally can reconcile God's inaction is what I stated above. He does not choose to miraculously intervene to prevent any human actions of any kind. Humans, therefore, are completely and totally responsible for their actions and God is not responsible for allowing some individual actions and preventing others.
My emotions were stirred because I cannot imagine burdening a rape victim, such as Waiting or Seven, with the notion that God allowed their rape for their own good.
You have every right to completely disagree with me. The above is only my opinion and I could be completely wrong.
As I said before, your viewpont is not an uncommon one. I believe that we tend to accept things that we have heard repeated for a long time. I also want to repeat that I know your comments were well-intentioned. You seem to be a very loving person, with only the very best of motives. I like you and I like your posts. I believe that everyone on this forum likes you and appreciates your posts, especially Seven and Waiting. To their credit, they did not take your comments personally or take offense.
I hope that my being so outspoken does not hurt your feelings. For me, it is a matter of conscience, because I care very much about persons who suffer unjustly at the hands of other people, as I know you do also.
Edited by - AhHah on 7 October 2000 15:11:23