Charlie,
I fully respect your right to you having your beliefs. I am asking you in all sincerity: why believe the Bible? Have you researched Lower Criticism, Higher Criticism, or the canonization processes?
It is too easy to hide behind pigeon-holes such as "skeptic" without addressing the substance.
If your foundation is only belief, then do not be dogmatic that you are correct and that you "know" other interpretations are incorrect.
On what basis do you know that the writers at Rev 7 and Rev 14 were explicitly referring to that text in Isaiah?
DougActually, Doug, you're forcing me to admit more than I'd prefer to. And this is something you can never believe but it's true, but here goes:.
Luke 9:27 ""Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God."
1 Thess 4:15 "We tell you this directly from the Lord: We who are still living when the Lord returns will not meet him ahead of those who have died. For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever."
John 21:23 "Because of this, the rumor spread among the believers that this disciple
would not die. But Jesus did not say that he would not die; he only
said, "If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to
you?"
IF the Bible is true, then a group of people from the 1st Century never died and are still alive today. There were always two groups back then. Those who would die and be resurrected and those who would remain alive all that time until Christ returned. At 1 Thess. they were wondering who would end up in heaven first, those being resurrected or those who were "still alive" when he came? Paul explained that no one would go ahead of the other to heaven. But instead, the dead would first come back in physical bodies and join those still alive. Then after that they would be transformed. That is, all the elect are on the earth during the 1000-year reign of Christ, including Christ himself. Among those the Bible confirms would not die are John and Paul.
Having said that and IF that is really true, then that adds a lot of confidence in whatever scriptures we have now available to us. That is, that what we have is sufficient and effective enough to fulfill its purpose. Plus it would be obvious that Paul and John were key in shepherding and manipulating what we have. Of course, obviously, Paul and John are the greatest contributors to the NT writers, are they not? John wrote John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John, plus Revelation. Paul wrote all those letters.
So from my perspective, whatever we have is basically what they allowed since they never died. You speak of the canon. I trust the canon because I know John and Paul had a lot to do with the canon. Now later on some other books not inspired got into even the common Bible, like Ecclesiates, Song of Solomon and the Book of Esther. But none of those books are cross-quoted from by the NT Bible writers, meaning John and Paul, who probably purposely cross-quoted from every book of the OT they considered to be inspired or wanted to include in the final product: the Bible.
So it really isn't fair to ask me why I believe because I'm not really going by faith any more. I'm part of the secret conspiracy of John and Paul and other saints who have more direct access to God, angels and holy spirit. But I'm an incredible exception to the rule. That's why I don't blame you for not believing. But I believe because I'm part of the process and prophecies relating to the elect. You can't possibly believe John and Paul are still alive. I know that. But I've seen them personally, so I have to believe. It's just that simple.
Now are you satisfied?