hard questions lead to problematic answers.
"tricky, complicated, and controversial.).
emotions stem from values and values are personal.
In our world TODAY, there are people who riot, destroy property, kill and vocalize grievance IN TERMS OF RACE.
I would like a one-sentence answer to the question: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
Asians, Blacks, Whites
In our world there are people who riot, destroy property, kill and vocalize grievance IN TERMS OF RELIGION.
I would like a one-sentence answer to the question: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
Asians, Blacks, Whites
hard questions lead to problematic answers.
"tricky, complicated, and controversial.).
emotions stem from values and values are personal.
In our world TODAY, there are people who riot, destroy property, kill and vocalize grievance IN TERMS OF RACE.
I would like a one-sentence answer to the question: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
These people are individuals who have or are currently at a systematic disadvantages or are the racial minority.
In our world there are people who riot, destroy property, kill and vocalize grievance IN TERMS OF RELIGION.
I would like a one-sentence answer to the question: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
These people are individuals who have or are currently at a systematic disadvantages or are the religious minority.
What--if anything--do these two groups share in common about their effectiveness in SOLVING the problem which enrages them?
They can not change the minds of people who have the power when they want them to.
during heated debates people - who are normaly quite rational - often start employing bad reasoning.
it's important that when we're emotionaly invested in a topic we don't let our feelings destroy our ability to put forth valid arguments.
the best way to bring people to our side of a debate is by using good logic.
Coded Logic, I am not sure if this thread would be the appropriat place to post this, but I can not create another thread for 13 hours and I really would like another persons take on this issue so I figured I would ask this question here. Feel free to ignore this if you feel it may derail your thread. What are your (or anyone else for that matters) views on how "tribalism" plays a role in preventing posters from making logical arguments and rational arguments.
I spent some time yesterday going through a couple of threads and I realized that there was no way that either a free exchange of thought or a fair an unbiased discussion could continue. It was kind of dis heartening because I wanted to jump in but I then realized that it would be like walking in front of a moving train.
