Im more bothered by some of the former jw’s 😂😂
_Morpheus
JoinedPosts by _Morpheus
-
28
Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Bother You At All?
by minimus ini faded from the religion and simply didn’t go back.
once people understood that my family and i left, people in the congregation didn’t know what to do.
should they call me, visit me, leave me alone?
-
51
They would Stone us if the law would allow
by ElderEtta inseveral years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.
-
_Morpheus
Fat, i appreciate the logical response. My retort is above. That is a recension, plain as day. You remark regarding anecdotal accounts is exactly right. I have known plenty of jw’s who would take a shot at apostates, given a chance. That doesn't make it wt policy, it doesnt mean the wt org teaches such actions.
im simply presenting things as they are, not as some would wish them to be.
-
51
They would Stone us if the law would allow
by ElderEtta inseveral years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.
-
_Morpheus
I took it that the phrase ''Several years ago...... I read'' to be past tense,
Lol see! You arnt as stupid as you pretend :) you do know “several years ago” is past tense and, im assuming, you are then smart enough to know it doesn't mean, in any context other than geology, 65 years ago.
Common ground is amazing!
-
51
They would Stone us if the law would allow
by ElderEtta inseveral years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.
-
_Morpheus
Face palms. Just palms in faces all over. Its hard not to think some of you play stupid for laughs, and yet i know some of it is sincere. For the sake of discussion, i will treat it as sincere...
here is the OP:
Several years ago unless I was dreaming I read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.
None of that is phrased as past tense or historical. Its all present tense and phrased to read, to anyone for whom english is their first language , as if this was written a few years ago and still current watchtower thought. Thats why it matters. To try and play as if this is any way current makes all who leave the org or who criticize the org look like idiots. We take quotes from 65 years ago and run with them, making them appear to have been printed a mere “several years ago”. Thats factually and purposefully dishonest and undermines real debate on the organization. It ruins credibility. Thats why it matters.
Before this goes off the rails, yes the quote is relevant, in context and with the proper historical perspective. When a source like jwfacts quotes the wt, with date and publication references, its completelty legitimate for discussion... but without that acknowledgment and source reference its deceitful and underhanded. Of course the OP has been meet with the usual froth of “yea the wt is evil!” With few willing to have the honest discussion as to how long ago this was... no we would rather jump up and down and get in a tizzy if anyone points out how foolish this whole thing is or tries to add the least bit of perspective.
But dont let me throw the cold water of logic on your pep rally. Continue as you were :)
-
51
They would Stone us if the law would allow
by ElderEtta inseveral years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.
-
_Morpheus
There are simply not enough facepalms.
-
51
They would Stone us if the law would allow
by ElderEtta inseveral years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.
-
_Morpheus
That snark was completely uncalled for. Besides, how would you define it? 'Several years ago' is far more accurate than 'a few years ago.' What, should she have said 'eons ago' instead?
No, it was completely called for. 1952 was 65 years ago. Thats several overlapping generations. Only a complete moron would call that “several years ago” in any context other than geological. It was more than several decades. Its very literally a lifetime ago.
If you want to hold it ahainst them, by all means. They said it. Just attribute it correctly... the problem is saying it was 65 years ago automatically makes it less relevant so you want to obscure the time line.
Fail.
-
51
They would Stone us if the law would allow
by ElderEtta inseveral years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.
-
_Morpheus
So, 1952 is your definition of “several years ago”?
-
72
Did you know Banks create money out of thin air?
by TerryWalstrom inbanks create money “out of thin air.”empirical studies have been undertaken to prove this thesis and this is the conclusion:.
in the 5,000 year history of banking, banks have been thought of as “deposit taking institutions which lend money”.. 1. what is the legal reality?
banks don’t take deposits and don’t lend money.the public is under this false impression on purpose because the language of banks is not legal language.. so--what is a “deposit”?a deposit is not actually a deposit.
-
_Morpheus
With respect, who you married is irrelevant with regard to the origin of the anti banking/anti jew conspiracy theory's. They center on the world being run by jews via banks.
-
34
Yesterday's WT slip up
by neat blue dog inwhen the israelites left egypt in 1513 b.c.e., they may have numbered more than three million.
spanning three or even four generations.
🤭.
-
_Morpheus
Did they.... overlap?
-
30
Our daughter was free to make her own choice.
by StephaneLaliberte inwhen eloise dupuis gave birth to her son in 2016, there were complications where a blood transfusion would have saved her live.
however, she refused and died; to the horror of the medical staff and the entire province of quebec.. two years later, there was a change in politics and the topic came back up in the media.
the parents of eloise dupuis, obviously exhausted by the media coverage, wrote a comment to a well known news paper in quebec.
-
_Morpheus
Just to make things clear, I do believe that Eloise made her choice.
Nice to find some common ground :) i have a feeling it wont last long...
My point however is that she was not entirely free to make that choice due to tremendous pressure from her group had she gone the other way.
See, that didnt last long. now you have reversed course. Either she made a choice or not. She was entirely free. We know this because, as you said, she choose. That you disagree with the choice or would have choosen differently does not negate that she choose.
People make poor medical and financial choices every day. They make these choices based on factors that may seem strange or downright stupid to us, but they made them anyway. It was their right to make them and to be stupid, if they wish. Thats freedom. Its a bitch.
You are suggesting that individuals freedom should be stripped and people forced in your mold... in the name of freedom.
It is not because the victim has the ability to free himself/herself that as a society, we should ignore the abusers who are making their lives miserable. Like we would not ignore an abusive husband, in a similar manner, we should not ignore abusive elders.
And now you have exposed your real problem. You are laying the organizations blood policy at the feet of “abusive elders”. Elders no more make policy than ministerial servants or pioneers. I dont know your story and im not asking, but it sounds like you were done wrong by some local yahoos and now want to hold “elders” accountable for all wrongs ever done.
Elders have no power to make people choose. The organization doesnt either. Empower people to make smart choices and stop excusing bad ones. Nobody benefits from being told they had no choice when they in fact had ALL the choices.