Wow of all the nerve.... To claim that not being able to df someone would hirt their ablity to protect children.... Just wow.
i hope this man continues the fine fight and i LOVE his theory regarding the "implied" nature of the annoucment. I wish such case could be made in the USA
edited to add: i have no problem with the wt retaining the right to decide who can and cannot be in their club but the required shunning that come with explusion is unfathomable from a legal POV. I have said before and will say again: i dare the WT to drop the unchristain practice of shunning and see how few actually stay 'witnesses'.