As others have noted, this is 100% the formula. When i conducted the wt i realized the basic format and then realized the truth: i didnt need to prepare to conduct. Not even 5 min. Not 5 seconds. If i ever got a little lost i just had someone read a scripture and scanned the next paragraph. It was so simplistic as to be insulting.
_Morpheus
JoinedPosts by _Morpheus
-
22
Only one real point per WT study...
by JW_Rogue inhas anyone else noticed that in the wt study articles the main point they want you to remember is always somewhere around paragraph 11-14?
it's like a formula.
intro and overview paragraphs 1-4. basic wt stuff 5-8 (not controversial).
-
-
-
286
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Gay Couple
by Simon inseems like such an obviously correct decision to overturn the previous overreach - it should never have been necessary to go to the supreme court but happened because the rights of the religious were being ignored.. as the fundamental level, no one should be able to compel you to work for them or to provide services that go against your beliefs, and certainly not have the government be able to force you to comply.. if this was allowed there would be so many unreconcilable situations that would clog up courts over nonsense.. i also have little patience for these activists that intentionally look to be offended.
it really doesn't do their cause any good to go round looking to make trouble for people.
it's also misguided because it ends up strengthening religious rights over effectively stupid issues.. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.
-
-
_Morpheus
What's clear is that not supporting same-sex marriage does not make you a homophobe, although the word has now become so over-used it's virtually meaningless
X2
Seems that the Colorado Commission is fine if a baker (who supported LGBT community) refused to bake cakes with anti-gay messages, but doesn't agree if a religious baker refuses to bake cakes for gay weddings.
Yep. But thats ok because it goes the way the radical left wants.
-
286
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Gay Couple
by Simon inseems like such an obviously correct decision to overturn the previous overreach - it should never have been necessary to go to the supreme court but happened because the rights of the religious were being ignored.. as the fundamental level, no one should be able to compel you to work for them or to provide services that go against your beliefs, and certainly not have the government be able to force you to comply.. if this was allowed there would be so many unreconcilable situations that would clog up courts over nonsense.. i also have little patience for these activists that intentionally look to be offended.
it really doesn't do their cause any good to go round looking to make trouble for people.
it's also misguided because it ends up strengthening religious rights over effectively stupid issues.. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.
-
-
_Morpheus
@john- so if larry flint demanded a pornographic cake you would be ok with the court forcing the baker to make it?
-
286
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Gay Couple
by Simon inseems like such an obviously correct decision to overturn the previous overreach - it should never have been necessary to go to the supreme court but happened because the rights of the religious were being ignored.. as the fundamental level, no one should be able to compel you to work for them or to provide services that go against your beliefs, and certainly not have the government be able to force you to comply.. if this was allowed there would be so many unreconcilable situations that would clog up courts over nonsense.. i also have little patience for these activists that intentionally look to be offended.
it really doesn't do their cause any good to go round looking to make trouble for people.
it's also misguided because it ends up strengthening religious rights over effectively stupid issues.. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.
-
-
_Morpheus
They didnt refuse to serve them. They refused to apply their artistic talent. They would have and offered to bake them a cake.
So slim i take it you would be ok woth being forced to advertise a jw convention?
“Jws are the one true religion. Follow the lead of the governing body. Millions now living will never die”
youd be ok woth being forced to make that billboard?
-
286
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Gay Couple
by Simon inseems like such an obviously correct decision to overturn the previous overreach - it should never have been necessary to go to the supreme court but happened because the rights of the religious were being ignored.. as the fundamental level, no one should be able to compel you to work for them or to provide services that go against your beliefs, and certainly not have the government be able to force you to comply.. if this was allowed there would be so many unreconcilable situations that would clog up courts over nonsense.. i also have little patience for these activists that intentionally look to be offended.
it really doesn't do their cause any good to go round looking to make trouble for people.
it's also misguided because it ends up strengthening religious rights over effectively stupid issues.. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.
-
-
_Morpheus
Sigh.... this is being misrepresent in some of the finer details.
The baker refused to make a custom cake. The customers could have bought any premade cake or even a custom cake that didnt require the owner to apply his artistic talent to something he morally objected to. It is in no way annalogous to police or ems responding. It is analogous to requiring a Muslim baker to bake a with crosses or ‘f**k mohamed’.
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
-
_Morpheus
I am now searching to find evidence of bank forclose of WTS.
😂😂😂 you do that. Please report back when you dont find anything.
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
-
_Morpheus
How can i say, in clear enough terms, that i am totally in agreement with cofty’s analysis/summation? Ive said exactly the same many many times.
Thats not collapse.
-
78
So What Drastic Money Change is Next?
by OnTheWayOut inokay, they cheapened the product by getting rid of hardcover books.
they reduced printing of mags.
they drastically reduced the number of pieces of printed paper that members would "place" in people's hands in various ways, the biggest one being that they put them on a cart and don't encourage people to take them.they cut d.o.
-
-
_Morpheus
It was more than a bethel heavy. It was dan sydlik
-
56
Signs You Would Like To See At Watchtower Convention
by Brokeback Watchtower ini think gb loesch has made some pretty bold statements that could be put in quotes with his picture attached could be a real killer!.
believe and obey only the faithful slave, don't believe any negative comment about us in the press believe only us.. google: child molestation watchtower bible and tract society, klick on wikki.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/jehovah%27s_witnesses%27_handling_of_child_sex_abuse.
-
-
_Morpheus
@bliz- id contribute for a billboard with that one
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
-
_Morpheus
.....you are not a nice person. You place your opinion above everyone else, and you spend more time bashing others here than you spend doing anything to help the cause.
hold on one second, checking my vast posting history..... nope. Dont see it. No mentions anywhere of me claiming to be a “nice person”. If you met me in person i have my moments, but i never claim to be “nice” generally speaking.
As for helping the cause... oh far more than you appear to give me credit for. In the context of our discussion here, my pointing out the often foolish and exaggerated claims of the rapid and foaming at the mouth posters who misrepsent facts in an attempt to make the org the boogie man for everything is a huge service. Its too easy for questioning jw’s to get scared away by nonsensical and stupid claims, things like the gb are planning on the assignations of partakers (yes that was said recently).
Calling out that sort of crap is a huge service, whether you appreciate or not. There is so much wrong with the cult that we simply need not make anything up, and especially not outlandish bullshit. If pointing out that the gb coordinating assignations is idiotic qualifies as “bashing” then im guilty as charged. Its idiotic.
Your argument about Ray being the big teller and the rest is shite is BS.
uhmmm... again let me reread..... nope dont see that. I said leaks are nothing new. I never said the rest was worthless. Far from it. Every letter to the BOE, the ks txt book, etc etc has great value and if not for those leaks we wouldnt have anything since ray.
You seemed to think leaks were new, as if a two year old internal pep rally video was monumental and unprecedented in its release. It has value. That a leak was sprung isnt new or noteworthy, per say. See my remarks regarding ray franz 35 years ago. Read what i actually said, not what you wanted me to have said.
I am sure I appreciate Ray as much as the next fella here, and I’ll bet more than you, having a shoe box full of paper correspondence with him over the years and other such.
i bet you do. Never knew him, never meet him, never corresponded with him. Hes not a big hero of mine.
Why don’t you find something to add of value...
helping you see some degree of rationality is valuable, even if you dont think so.