_Morpheus

Joined

• started 61 topics
• posted 4,506 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by _Morpheus

• 
  22

  Do you know which Watchtower publication this picture came from?

  by McLovin in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  I dont object to yelling those words, @running away. I yell them everyday. Few seem to listen.
• 
  144

  Asylum Caravan

  by dubstepped in

  1. social
  2. current

  alright, so what is the deal with the thousands coming to the states right at election time seeking asylum?

  i'm not up on this, usually try not to be, but how can this not be manipulative?

  it's either manipulative in the size of the group and pressure that creates, or in where it started or who started this, etc.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  https://www.hannity.com/media-room/tapped-out-tijuana-mayor-says-city-cant-cope-with-30000-per-day-bill-for-migrant-caravan/
  
• 
  28

  Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Bother You At All?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i faded from the religion and simply didn’t go back.

  once people understood that my family and i left, people in the congregation didn’t know what to do.

  should they call me, visit me, leave me alone?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Im more bothered by some of the former jw’s 😂😂
• 
  51

  They would Stone us if the law would allow

  by ElderEtta in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  

  Fat, i appreciate the logical response. My retort is above. That is a recension, plain as day. You remark regarding anecdotal accounts is exactly right. I have known plenty of jw’s who would take a shot at apostates, given a chance. That doesn't make it wt policy, it doesnt mean the wt org teaches such actions.

  im simply presenting things as they are, not as some would wish them to be.
• 
  51

  They would Stone us if the law would allow

  by ElderEtta in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  I took it that the phrase ''Several years ago...... I read'' to be past tense,

  Lol see! You arnt as stupid as you pretend :) you do know “several years ago” is past tense and, im assuming, you are then smart enough to know it doesn't mean, in any context other than geology, 65 years ago.

  Common ground is amazing!
  
  
• 
  51

  They would Stone us if the law would allow

  by ElderEtta in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Face palms. Just palms in faces all over. Its hard not to think some of you play stupid for laughs, and yet i know some of it is sincere. For the sake of discussion, i will treat it as sincere...

  here is the OP:

  Several years ago unless I was dreaming I read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.

  None of that is phrased as past tense or historical. Its all present tense and phrased to read, to anyone for whom english is their first language , as if this was written a few years ago and still current watchtower thought. Thats why it matters. To try and play as if this is any way current makes all who leave the org or who criticize the org look like idiots. We take quotes from 65 years ago and run with them, making them appear to have been printed a mere “several years ago”. Thats factually and purposefully dishonest and undermines real debate on the organization. It ruins credibility. Thats why it matters.

  Before this goes off the rails, yes the quote is relevant, in context and with the proper historical perspective. When a source like jwfacts quotes the wt, with date and publication references, its completelty legitimate for discussion... but without that acknowledgment and source reference its deceitful and underhanded. Of course the OP has been meet with the usual froth of “yea the wt is evil!” With few willing to have the honest discussion as to how long ago this was... no we would rather jump up and down and get in a tizzy if anyone points out how foolish this whole thing is or tries to add the least bit of perspective.

  But dont let me throw the cold water of logic on your pep rally. Continue as you were :)
  
  
• 
  51

  They would Stone us if the law would allow

  by ElderEtta in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  There are simply not enough facepalms.
• 
  51

  They would Stone us if the law would allow

  by ElderEtta in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  That snark was completely uncalled for. Besides, how would you define it? 'Several years ago' is far more accurate than 'a few years ago.' What, should she have said 'eons ago' instead?

  No, it was completely called for. 1952 was 65 years ago. Thats several overlapping generations. Only a complete moron would call that “several years ago” in any context other than geological. It was more than several decades. Its very literally a lifetime ago.

  If you want to hold it ahainst them, by all means. They said it. Just attribute it correctly... the problem is saying it was 65 years ago automatically makes it less relevant so you want to obscure the time line.

  Fail.
  
  
• 
  51

  They would Stone us if the law would allow

  by ElderEtta in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several years ago unless i was dreaming i read a watchtower quotation that effectively said that they would execute us as disfellowshipped individuals if the law would allow.. was i dreaming?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  So, 1952 is your definition of “several years ago”?
• 
  72

  Did you know Banks create money out of thin air?

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  banks create money “out of thin air.”empirical studies have been undertaken to prove this thesis and this is the conclusion:.

  in the 5,000 year history of banking, banks have been thought of as “deposit taking institutions which lend money”.. 1. what is the legal reality?

  banks don’t take deposits and don’t lend money.the public is under this false impression on purpose because the language of banks is not legal language.. so--what is a “deposit”?a deposit is not actually a deposit.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  With respect, who you married is irrelevant with regard to the origin of the anti banking/anti jew conspiracy theory's. They center on the world being run by jews via banks.