Posts by azor
-
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty inhot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.
but it's all quiet here.
are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
-
azor
I do get what you were trying to state on your post. What you demonstrated was scientific discovery. It is not related to CD. So I take it that you do not have doubts about your beliefs. Is that correct? -
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty inhot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.
but it's all quiet here.
are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
-
azor
Look up the definition of cognitive dissonance. A person's confidence in there belief is a perfect example of cognitive dissonance. Doubt is not a definition of CD. Your statement above demonstrates fully what CD is. It is a statement that would fit perfectly in the dictionary as an example of CD.
Have you read any of the articles on jwfacts.com? If so which ones? If not why not? -
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty inhot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.
but it's all quiet here.
are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
-
azor
Current jws are not dimwits. You are over simplifying. Cognitive dissonance is on full display with all believers. Read "escaping cult mind control" by Stephen Hassan. Watch "Going Clear" about scientology and how they work. And the biggest must read is jwfacts.com. -
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty inhot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.
but it's all quiet here.
are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
-
azor
Nitty is your husband aware of your viewing and participation on this site? -
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty inhot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.
but it's all quiet here.
are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
-
azor
@ nitty. Why are you on this forum? What are you getting out of it? If you are still a jw in mind and heart you are already breaking your leaders rules. -
35
What Would Happen if the Watchtower Loses Their TAX EXEMPT STATUS?
by John Aquila inwould it really affect them?
how would it affect volunteers at any construction project since that work would now be taxable.
any materials they buy would be taxable.
-
azor
It is time for humanity to grow up. All religious institutions must at some point, hopefully in the near future lose their tax exempt status. -
204
Candace Conti Settles
by Nitty-Gritty inhot topic on topix seems to be candace conti settlement.
but it's all quiet here.
are you guys aware that your hero, who was not in it for the money but to change policies, settled without changing anything?
-
azor
Nasty nitty. What a grotesque thing to state in the OP. You should be ashamed of yourself. Only a religionist could say, believe, and practice the things you do and say.
-
131
On the Relevancy of The Institutionalization of Sin
by Perry inchild murder, sodomy & corrupting the human genome are not new sins, they are old ones.
what is new is their institutionalization.
but even that isn't totally new.
-
azor
Proof? Anecdotal is not proof? -
131
On the Relevancy of The Institutionalization of Sin
by Perry inchild murder, sodomy & corrupting the human genome are not new sins, they are old ones.
what is new is their institutionalization.
but even that isn't totally new.
-
azor
Perry you said existence is forever. Prove it. -
50
what an interesting find for me
by sowhatnow inim sure to use this the next time i accidentally get sucked into an argument with someone.
im not ever understanding the idea behind any christian religion picking and choosing what they want to believe and follow, then have the nerve to claim they are right, when clearly this is obviously done.
here is a site that shows not only how bloodthirsty and evil the god of the hebrew bible was, but how more ridiculous it is for jws to follow one twisted 'commandment' about eating blood, not only reading it wrong, but then not to do all the other commandments, willingly , do they think they are ancient israelites ?
-
azor
Janza I just have one question for you. Are you a pre-suppositionalist?