Ballistic your right on the money. This thread is a load of crap.
Heatmiser
JoinedPosts by Heatmiser
-
121
The Proof!!!!: The Use of Explosives on 911 at the World Trade Center Compl
by Ianone innew video analysis from alex jones, absolute proof of wtc explosives, you must watch this!
the proof!!!!
: the use of explosives on 911 at the world trade center complex .
-
-
-
121
The Proof!!!!: The Use of Explosives on 911 at the World Trade Center Compl
by Ianone innew video analysis from alex jones, absolute proof of wtc explosives, you must watch this!
the proof!!!!
: the use of explosives on 911 at the world trade center complex .
-
-
Heatmiser
on the record, "to withstain planes hitting it."
Tell us the scenario on record that it is to withstand. That is the problem with the shit you spout. You only tell half the story or only part of it that makes it look like it supports your view. If you know what the "on record" is, why didn't you state the scenario it was supposed to be able to survive? Because it doesn't support your view.
It is a lot different than what realy happened. The design specs where for a smaller aircraft(707), hardly any fuel going slow (scenario of plane lost in bad weather in landing mode at end of journey with very light fuel load)
What hit them 767, full of fuel and one was going 400+mph other 500+mph. which means the damage caused far exceeded the design specs.
edited: HA you already knew what I was going to say. You where cutting and pasting while I was typing....LOL
-
-
-
Heatmiser
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZ....hello?....BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...hello?...BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...hello?
I guess she didn't have a sense of smell also.
-
25
newbie hooked on this board
by glenwoodswoman ini am new to this board, posted only a few times so far.
no i find myslef going to the computer time after time to check this site and i feel like i am getting hooked!
what is the matter with me?
-
-
Heatmiser
Welcome
Here is my 2 cents on your work issue.
Don't treat her any different than your other coworkers. Her being new means she is probably on a probationary period where the company can get rid of her easily. Bring the issue up to your supervisor and or HR. You being a long time employee with (i am assuming) a good track record should be valued at your company. But what ever you do don't treat her any differently than you treat your coworkers or she can turn the claim around on you even though you didn't start it. Hopefully she will act this way in front of other employees so as you will have witnesses on her actions. If she is dumb enough, she might even e-mail you about the issue and you will have documentation. Keep a little notebook and keep a record of her discriminations to you. HR should take quick action once notified because they don't want any lawsuites for any type of discremination being allowed to happen within the company.
And again, WELCOME to the board
Heatmiser
-
25
About missiles and warheads
by Puternut incan you figure this one out?.
http://media.skoopy.com/audio/aud_0023.wav.
puternut
-
-
Heatmiser
It doesn't know where it is but it knows where it isn't........all pretty clear to me
-
121
The Proof!!!!: The Use of Explosives on 911 at the World Trade Center Compl
by Ianone innew video analysis from alex jones, absolute proof of wtc explosives, you must watch this!
the proof!!!!
: the use of explosives on 911 at the world trade center complex .
-
-
Heatmiser
With all that hot heat that affect the entire building, why were there survivors? For that same heat to affect other floors it would have to affect the people in the staircases.
The stuctural failure started in the damaged sections. That is why in the videos you see them coming down from the damaged areas and above at first. Then the floors below started failing in a "domino" or cascading effect from all of the collapsed sections weight that far exceded the design limits of the undamaged sections. As each new floor collapsed it just added expodentialy the forces on each floor under it.
-
40
"the Grudge"
by missy04 ini know there was a thread about this movie not too long ago but i don't know where it is.
sorry for repeating stuff.. has any of you guys seen this movie?.
omg i will never sleep again!
-
-
Heatmiser
Now that I can watch R, X rated movies I decided to give this one a try.
Just stick with the X and you'll be alright.
-
121
The Proof!!!!: The Use of Explosives on 911 at the World Trade Center Compl
by Ianone innew video analysis from alex jones, absolute proof of wtc explosives, you must watch this!
the proof!!!!
: the use of explosives on 911 at the world trade center complex .
-
-
Heatmiser
The main headers which receive the intermediate beams have 'clips.' The intermediate beams have steel 'tongues.' This steel tongue is inserted into the female clip and we have to use a heavy sledge hammer to force it in. These intermediate beams were beveled because they were to be welded.
Sounds pretty interesting. Did they ever tell you guys why they used that method instead of a traditional joint? I get a mental picture of a "dove tail" type joint.
-
121
The Proof!!!!: The Use of Explosives on 911 at the World Trade Center Compl
by Ianone innew video analysis from alex jones, absolute proof of wtc explosives, you must watch this!
the proof!!!!
: the use of explosives on 911 at the world trade center complex .
-
-
Heatmiser
Scientific teams simulated the fires from jet fuel at WTC, using similar steel in the WTC, and concluded that the steel did not melt at the tempertures speculated to have reached before the collapse. Let me get the article.
Steel doesn't have to melt to lose structural integrity. All It takes is HEAT. I have seen steel plates warp and sag under there own weight from fires so take it as you will.
wasn't there a building somewhere a few years that was on fire for over 24 hours and it remained standing, it never collapsed?
Yes and I am sure Ianone will be happy to post the pic for you. BUT that building didn't have a passenger airliner hit it either, plus it was a traditionaly constructed building not trusses. Comparing apples and oranges.
As I have stated before, the building probably wouldn't have collapsed from just the AC damage and it would have difinatly not collapsed in just a fire. It was the COMBINATION of structural damage and fire. The damage done by the AC also damaged the fire proofing on the structural steel in the areas of the impact so the heat from the fires weakend the steel enough in those areas past the point it could not hold the load anymore.
Here is a question for you Ianone. Why do they put fire proofing material on steel? The steel isn't flammable, so why do they do it?
-
-
-
Heatmiser
Nice....um.....pout...yeah thats it, pout satanus
