Posts by seesthesky

97

Does the King Kong movie have racist overtones?

by enlightenedcynic in

hey everybody,.

was having a discussion with a co-worker about the new kk movie.

he asked if i saw it already.

seesthesky

intersting discussion - those saying no racism exists in the KK movie and other flicks remind me of "white" people when i was growing up saying to non-white people whom they "befriended"-

"you're not like other black/mexican/japanese people"

then seeming befuddled when the object of their "affection" suggested that the comment had racist overtones -

hell, how could a simple affectionate statement like that convey racism - and even if it did, it sure as hell wasn't intended to -

which is precisely my point

heh

103

REVIEW OF JCS "BIG NEWS" ARTICLE

by Oroborus21 in

note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.

supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.

the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.

seesthesky

auld soul said: "Agreed. And I have spoken to a concerned party on another matter in your behalf."

ME: I hope i m mistaken but - based on my careful study of this thread and threads related to it - this sounds weird to me - like a threat of sorts re mr. esq.'s law license - i sure hope this aint the case - if so, then i got no repect for ya AS - if i'm wrong then please accept my apologies for thinking the worst

103

REVIEW OF JCS "BIG NEWS" ARTICLE

by Oroborus21 in

note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.

supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.

the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.

seesthesky

Auldsoul wrote:

"I would love to hear Steve2 or Eduardo comment on whether the intent of the indoctrination is weightier than the result to the indoctrinated.

ME: I ain't eduardo or steve 2 so sorry if i disappoint - anyway - it seems the answer to your question depends on the jurisdiction under which any complaint would be brought and what legal theory the facts in the complaint could support - e.g., does the legal theory require proof of intent, recklessness, or negligence - my 2 cents

103

REVIEW OF JCS "BIG NEWS" ARTICLE

by Oroborus21 in

note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.

supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.

the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.

seesthesky

Auldsoul - also, what was/were the rules of professional conduct that this person was alleged to have violated by posting on a forum?

103

REVIEW OF JCS "BIG NEWS" ARTICLE

by Oroborus21 in

note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.

supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.

the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.

seesthesky

Auldsoul wrote:

"I personally know of a recent serious attempt made to disbar someone for posting to a discussion forum in their capacity as an attorney. The amount of arguable counsel/solicitation involved was considerably less than your examples here."

ME: Wow - when u say "in their" capacity as an attorney do you mean that the person to whom you referred gave specific legal advice on a forum? Or was the person offering general legal opinions? What state was this? I find this quite interesting - can you provide more details - either in this thread or in a personal message?

103

REVIEW OF JCS "BIG NEWS" ARTICLE

by Oroborus21 in

note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.

supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.

the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.

seesthesky

someone asked:

1093

THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.

by AndersonsInfo in

if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

have i ever misled you?

i'll answer that--no!

seesthesky

AuldSoul wrote: "As a joke, thus the [smiley face icon] I thought you saw it..."

ME: NO HUMOR ALLOWED!

heh ;-{)

1093

THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.

by AndersonsInfo in

if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

have i ever misled you?

i'll answer that--no!

seesthesky

AuldSoul wrote: "I think you are intentionally creating a distorted view of what skeeter1 wrote. I hope no harm results from your reckless disregard for consequences."

ME: Why would you infer anyting about my intentions - I've given no basis for the inference except a sloppy recapitualtion of what "skeeter1" wrote - that slopiness could have resulted from drunkeness, laziness or simple misunderstanding - i vote for laziness

ME: I am under that impression that every scientific paper which is published must first undergo peer review - I did not mean to convey that I believe papers ADVANCED for publication first get peer reviewed - the misunderstanding resulted from my sloppy summary of what "skeeter1" wrote - nonetheless, I still think it funny that "skeeter1" views the process for publishing law review journals as the equivalent of the process for publishing scientific papers - that's just funny to me - not because of the mistaken belief but because of the way the mistaken belief was propounded - like "and, by the way - this stuff is legit and beyond debate because it was peer reviewed just like science papers are - and science is true" - lol

1093

THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.

by AndersonsInfo in

if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

have i ever misled you?

i'll answer that--no!

seesthesky

someone wrote: "Seethesky. Science is also theory too. Mr. Davis is more of an expert on religious theory and its trends than either you, I, or Mr. Esq. He saw the trend that Ms. L-W's article could take. So did the other two peer reviewers who had to give their 'thumbs up.' "

uhh - okee dokee! - btw, do you sit as an editor on the journal? If not, how is it that you know what Mr. Davis or the other editors saw? Just asking a sincere question so don't get yer panties in a twist.

37

Campaign to destroy "lol"

by ballistic in

jw
friends

i'm not sure where this idea came from, but apparently it's been discovered that hardly anyone is actually "laughing out loud" when using the term "lol".

lol if they really are laughing out loud, there is something wrong with them (they could be retarded or have a bad sense of humor lol).

please show your support for my new cause in which i attempt to bannish the term lol from the english language.

seesthesky

lol