seesthesky

Joined

• started 15 topics
• posted 229 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by seesthesky

• 
  103

  REVIEW OF JCS "BIG NEWS" ARTICLE

  by Oroborus21 in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.

  supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.

  the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  i followed the "big news" thread - very weird - kind of, but not exactly, like a jw special announcment which turns out to concern a new method for handling watchtowers at the door and how that method will increase the sheep - lol
  
  even weirder is the circling of wagons with re to ms. anderson - someone please explain this to me -
• 
  1093

  THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

  have i ever misled you?

  i'll answer that--no!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  lol - "if he likes it" = peer review - lol - that is nothing like scientific peer review - and law is nothing like science - although law, historically, to gain social legitimacy, has incorporated into its lexicon words that sound "scientific" such as "theory" and methods of analysis that appear objective - but the truth is - the law usually evolves, not from fact to conclusion, but from desired result to supporting "theories" - indeed, that is the nature of u.s. law - lawyers take postions as advoctes for clients then figure out how to support them - because of this, any notion of "peer review" has little, if any, value insofar as such review, as in the hard sciences, serves to ensure accuracy - lol
• 
  1093

  THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

  have i ever misled you?

  i'll answer that--no!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  someone said: "The journal this is published in is a legal equaivalent of peer-reviewed scientific literature. The journal is not a publication that specialises in unfounded speculation, but rather in articles addressing law that are held to be a fair representation of or commentary on law."
  
  WRONG WRONG WRONG - the editors of law review jourals are, typically, law students - lol! - and the peer review amounts to published disagreements - law journal publication is nothing like the hard sciences - at least not in the U.S. - lol
• 
  1093

  THE NEWS IS BIGGER THAN DATELINE, BBC, CBC, ETC.

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  if i told you that something bigger is on the horizon than dateline, bbc, cbc, sunday (australia), and all other tv programs which exposed the sexual child abuse cover-up by watchtower in 2002-2003, would you believe me?

  have i ever misled you?

  i'll answer that--no!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  i know the truth - and the truth gonna make someone look mighty stoopid!
• 
  47

  The most EERIE passage in a Watchtower Publication leads to atheisim

  by Terry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the most eerie and fascinating passage i ever read in any of the jw literature (literature??

  ) was in the red book, life everlasting in freedom of the sons of god.

  i wish i had written the quote down.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  dude - you know everything - can we worship you? - man, if i pray to you can you help me? dude - u rock - right - you just know so damn much - dude, u r cool - i like your picture too - dude, i like how smart you are - man, you know you exist - can you prove to me that i do? - that would rock - if you do that, please let me know also how to pray to you - right on dude - yer kewl!
• 
  47

  Was I Disrespectful to Dr Singelenberg?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as some may know, richard singelenberg is a dutch anthropologist who studies jehovah's witnesses.

  he has produced academic articles and reviews on issues ranging from the 1975 disappointment and child custody cases to jehovah's witnesses in nazi germany and the history of the blood doctrine.

  sometimes he sides with apostates and sometimes he sides with the witnesses on controversial issues (though i personally suspect the former impulse is greater than the latter).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  HS wrote:
  
  "OldSoul,
  
  'Again, dink, you are seeing the invisible. I am here referring to the legal advice you offered repeatedly to HS in this thread, key phrase "rest of us". Bone up on that reading comprehension, sport.'
  
  "Thank you for patiently trying to educate seethesky, but you are wasting your valuable time. The buffoon is either a troll or an idiot, perhaps a mixture of both. His arguments are pure pap as well he/she knows. I suggest that you just flush your internet toilet, freshen the air, and move on.
  
  "Best regards - HS"
  
  lol - hs if u gonna call names do it well - "troll" - how original
• 
  47

  Was I Disrespectful to Dr Singelenberg?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as some may know, richard singelenberg is a dutch anthropologist who studies jehovah's witnesses.

  he has produced academic articles and reviews on issues ranging from the 1975 disappointment and child custody cases to jehovah's witnesses in nazi germany and the history of the blood doctrine.

  sometimes he sides with apostates and sometimes he sides with the witnesses on controversial issues (though i personally suspect the former impulse is greater than the latter).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  old soul wrote: "Perhaps seesthesky can offer you some clear advice. He is not as encumbered by the legal restrictions regarding legal advice as the rest of us lay people. He may charge you though, unless he is willing to offer his professional opinion pro bono. You may require the translation services of someone well versed in txt-msgng 2 unrstnd what he sez."
  
  uhh - what makes you think i'm a lawyer? - also, why r u fixated on me? - do something productive - you got a yard with grass? - mow it
• 
  47

  Was I Disrespectful to Dr Singelenberg?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as some may know, richard singelenberg is a dutch anthropologist who studies jehovah's witnesses.

  he has produced academic articles and reviews on issues ranging from the 1975 disappointment and child custody cases to jehovah's witnesses in nazi germany and the history of the blood doctrine.

  sometimes he sides with apostates and sometimes he sides with the witnesses on controversial issues (though i personally suspect the former impulse is greater than the latter).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  btt
• 
  47

  Was I Disrespectful to Dr Singelenberg?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as some may know, richard singelenberg is a dutch anthropologist who studies jehovah's witnesses.

  he has produced academic articles and reviews on issues ranging from the 1975 disappointment and child custody cases to jehovah's witnesses in nazi germany and the history of the blood doctrine.

  sometimes he sides with apostates and sometimes he sides with the witnesses on controversial issues (though i personally suspect the former impulse is greater than the latter).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  old soul, also, offering an opinion can constitute the practice of law - professional opinions = professional practice
  
  indeed, i ask my doctor what she thinks about my x, y and z and she says a, b and c - i pay for her opinion in such matters just as i would pay for the professionl opinion of my lawyer - and payment or the lack thereof neither creates nor negates professional practice (of law, medicine, engineering, etc.)
• 
  47

  Was I Disrespectful to Dr Singelenberg?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as some may know, richard singelenberg is a dutch anthropologist who studies jehovah's witnesses.

  he has produced academic articles and reviews on issues ranging from the 1975 disappointment and child custody cases to jehovah's witnesses in nazi germany and the history of the blood doctrine.

  sometimes he sides with apostates and sometimes he sides with the witnesses on controversial issues (though i personally suspect the former impulse is greater than the latter).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  seesthesky

  old soul, here's a legal opinion by HS:
  
  "If the WTS publicly misrepresented the work of any of the persons mentioned in your comment, as they would need to to discuss any matter associated with them theologically, named them in their work, and this impacted their private or business life in *any* way, they can and would be sued."
  
  "they can . . . be sued" = a legal conclusion about a particular party in a particular set of circumstances -
  
  i do not understand what you mean by calling me an "officer" - an officer of what?