My dilemma is I can’t get my head around evolution. I have not looked deep enough into it yet, but I am having to, being I have no answers. But for me, the "first cause" lets that theory down (Not the big bang, but the first organism to exist). I have read a few explanations about the "first cause" but it didn’t really stick with me personally. Links between species is another part of evolution that I would like to know more about, but it does seem funny that there is not more fossilisation that shows the links between species, if any, although I have been told that there is evidence. I would like to see more of that kind of evidence if there is.
Hi there. One thing to keep in mind regarding evolution is that it does not necessarily need to address a first cause. For example, it is perfectly possible that someone created life and let it evolve from there. (I don't think this is true, but it is a logical possibility.) The people who are trying to bind everything together are the creationists, because it plays into their style of "explain it all in a 32-page brochure."
The reason I point out the disjoint is because it's best to first understand evolution by looking at the more recent examples and evidence. It is absolutely clear that evolution occurs, and there is amazing evidence for how it has happened in the last billion years. Going back 4 billion years it gets a little foggy simply because of the paucity of surviving evidence. But after you understand the mechanisms of evolution, you'll be in a better position to understand the ways in which life itself could have arisen from the same sort of principles.
Go to the library and grab a few books. I'd recommend Dawkins. He's an enjoyable read and extremely mind-expanding.
Best wishes,
SNG