Jwsons -
Amen, this shares holding matter should be inspired by ....,too?
Please tell me English is not your first language.
Deddaisy -
Since you are going to respond in detail, I might as well give you a little more so you can do it all in one shot.
"(with no voting proxy I believe they have no control)" Regarding this comment, you may want to go back and read my FIRST COMMENT in this threadYour first comment was
And the "voting" thing sounds like advice from a lawyer, just in case something like this happened. (It became public.)Well, sure, if you are a conspiracy theorist and that is what you want to believe. Since neither of us have talked to Mr. McCann, it's all speculation as to why he retained the voting proxy. My GUESS would be that since he was donating the stock, he figured the WT had no interest in actually running his company for him and he probably wanted the ability to control it himself.
Isn't that what they always do when their hands are caught in the cookie jar? (UN) This would certainly just make it alright wouldn't it? So I guess if I had an illegitimate child, if I "just got rid of it," everything would go away and everything would be fine....I see no correlation with your analogy and this situation. What do you propose the WT do with the stocks besides get rid of them? Perhaps notify the press that someone gave them stocks and then made a deal with another company to start a seperate company and that seperate company made products for the military? Should they shut the doors because of this military connection? I think getting rid of them by donating them back is the reasonable request.